The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.

PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)

Your presentation should:

1. Identify and select a screening tool  
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice. 
3. Provide recommendations.

· Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.

· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. 

· Cite within the text (each slide except for the introduction and reference slides) using APA 7th edition guidelines.

· PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

· The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

· Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

· CITE: Chapter 9 in Edelman, C. L., & Kudzma, E. C. (2021) to inform your response. In the references page

image1.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal