One of the most pressing yet often invisible public health issues today is intimate partner violence and caregiver abuse of older or vulnerable adults.

One of the most pressing yet often invisible public health issues today is intimate partner violence and caregiver abuse of older or vulnerable adults. These forms of violence occur in private spaces, often behind closed doors, and many victims are unable or afraid to ask for help. Healthy People 2030 acknowledges this concern through objectives such as “reducing the rate of physical assaults by intimate partners,” reflecting the need for urgent national attention and action (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). In my own community, where many elderly people depend on informal caregivers and where women may face cultural or financial barriers to leaving abusive relationships, this problem feels especially relevant. Choosing this as my focus topic throughout the course will allow me to better understand the role of healthcare providers in identifying, preventing, and addressing violence that too often remains hidden.

The effects of intimate partner violence and elder abuse are profound, affecting not only the immediate physical safety of victims, but also their mental health, long-term functioning, and access to care. According to the CDC, “about 1 in 10 people aged 60 and older who live at home experience abuse, including neglect and exploitation” (CDC, 2021). For older adults, the consequences of abuse can include malnutrition, injuries, worsened chronic conditions, anxiety, depression, and even death. In cases of IPV, victims may also experience reproductive issues, trauma, and a deep sense of helplessness. What makes this issue even more complex is that many victims remain silent—either out of fear, love, financial dependence, or because they have no one else to care for them. In many ways, these individuals become invisible, even when they are regularly seen by healthcare professionals.

Preventing complications begins with recognizing who is at higher risk. Several factors increase the likelihood of IPV or elder abuse: advanced age, cognitive decline, social isolation, limited financial resources, and dependency on caregivers or intimate partners. In many cases, the abuser may also be under stress, untrained, or struggling with substance use. As the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) emphasizes, “clinicians should remain alert for signs of abuse and be prepared to offer referrals to support services” (USPSTF, 2025). Screening is crucial, even when victims don’t speak up directly. Tools like HITS (Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream) and WAST (Women Abuse Screening Tool) help healthcare providers ask the right questions in a respectful and trauma-informed way. Equally important is building trust and creating a safe environment where patients feel seen and heard.

The USPSTF offers clear guidance to support routine screening for intimate partner violence and caregiver abuse, particularly in primary care settings. Their 2025 recommendation, which received a Grade B, supports screening women of reproductive age and vulnerable adults when appropriate follow-up services are in place. One of the strongest aspects of the USPSTF’s approach is its reliance on high-quality research and practical tools that clinicians can use in real-world settings. However, one area where the USPSTF could improve is in offering culturally tailored materials, especially for immigrant, non-English speaking, or rural populations. Many victims belong to groups that already face healthcare access barriers, and standard screening may not always be effective for them. More inclusive strategies would help bridge this gap and make prevention efforts more equitable.

Addressing intimate partner violence and elder abuse requires more than just awareness it requires action, compassion, and collaboration between health systems, community organizations, and individuals. The objectives outlined in Healthy People 2030 and the clinical recommendations of the USPSTF provide a strong foundation for addressing this issue through early detection, education, and support. As future health professionals, we must be proactive in creating spaces where patients feel safe and empowered to speak. When we recognize and respond to signs of abuse, we not only protect individuals we help break cycles of violence and restore dignity and trust in care.

                                                          References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Preventing elder abuse.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2025, June). Intimate partner violence and caregiver abuse: Screening.

Healthy People 2030. (n.d.). Injury and violence prevention. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS Thumbnails/thumbnail.png 1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS Thumbnails/thumbnail.png 1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN BLANK  parties for ICD-10-CM to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within ICD-10-CM. 2) Official coding guidelines use the term FILL IN BLANK  when referring to face-to-face contact between patients and health

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical analysis. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: Review the assigned chapters in Polit and Beck (2017): i.e., chapters 18-20. Identify five different facts or pieces of information that

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal