JOURNAL ENTRY #3 Critical reflection of your growth and development during your pediatric practicum experience in a clinical setting

JOURNAL ENTRY #3

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your pediatric practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

This week, you will write your last and final Journal Entry, reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement. Further reflect on your pediatric patients you have seen and the conditions that you have diagnosed and treated. Review your Journal Entry that you submitted in Week 1.

Journal Entry (2–3 pages):

· Explain what most excited and/or concerned you throughout your pediatric clinical experience.

· Discuss how your personal definition of family and family roles has changed or stayed the same.

· How has your understanding of family and family roles influenced your assessment of children and their families?

· Explain how your understanding of culture (both the culture of the provider and that of the child and his or her family) has changed and how it may have influenced the assessments you conducted during your practicum.

· Assess how you did with accomplishing the goals and objectives you developed in Week 1 for the practicum experience.

· Based on your practicum experience, refine your existing goals and/or develop new goals for your continued education and professional practice. Be sure to consider the NAPNAP Position Statement on Age Parameters for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice.

· Use title page and references according to APA.

RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommittee on Febrile Seizures. (2011). 

Febrile seizures: Guideline for the neurodiagnostic evaluation of the child with a simple febrile seizure.Links to an external site.
 
Pediatrics
127(2), 389–394.

Note: This is the most recent guideline.Links to an external site.

· National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, Professional Issues Committee. (2019). 

NAPNAP position statement on age parameters for pediatric nurse practitioner practice.Links to an external site.
 
Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, 33(2), A9–A11.

Links to an external site.

Practicum Resources

· HSoft Corporation. (2019). 


Welcome to MeditrekLinks to an external site.


. 

Note: Use this website to log in to Meditrek to report your clinical hours and patient encounters.Links to an external site.

· Walden University. (2019). 


MSN nurse practitioner practicum manual

Links to an external site.
. to an external site.

· Walden University Field Experience. (2019a). 


Field experience: College of Nursing.Links to an external site.

  to an external site.

· Walden University Field Experience. (2019b). 


Student practicum resources: NP student orientationLinks to an external site.


.

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

BY DAY 7

Complete your Journal Entry #3 Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK11Journal3+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric

PRAC_6541_Week11_Journal3_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection

50 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

49 to >39.0 pts

Good

Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

39 to >30.0 pts

Fair

Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

30 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth

30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

29 to >19.0 pts

Good

Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.

19 to >9.0 pts

Fair

Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.

9 to >0 pts

Poor

Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

14 to >10.0 pts

Good

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

5 to >0 pts

Poor

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

No APA errors

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains 1-2 APA errors

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains 3-5 APA errors

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains > 5 APA errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 6 Discussion Part I Table 1 Differential Diagnosis Pediatric Limp

Week 6 Discussion Part I Table 1 Differential Diagnosis Pediatric Limp Complete the table. CC limp Condition Age Pain (+ or -) Historical Findings Clinical Findings Causative Factors Management Developmental Dysplasia of Hip Leg-length Inequality Juvenile Arthritis Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) Legg-Calve-Perthes disease Transient synovitis Trauma Neoplasm Septic arthritis

MENTAL STATUS EXAM GUIDE Previous Mental Health Treatments (e g: psychopharmacology, inpatient stabilization, Occupational

MENTAL STATUS EXAM GUIDE Previous Mental Health Treatments (e g: psychopharmacology, inpatient stabilization, Occupational Therapy, Vocational Therapy, Marriage/Family Therapy, Group Therapy, Detox, ECT &/or social services): What is the initial impression of the admitting examiner found in the initial evaluation, triage, or social worker note: Compare your impression of the

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template With Psychotherapy Note Encounter date:

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template With Psychotherapy Note Encounter date: ________________________ Patient Initials: ______ Gender: M/F/Transgender ____ Age: _____ Race: _____ Ethnicity ____ Reason for Seeking Health Care: ______________________________________________ HPI:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SI/HI: _______________________________________________________________________________ Sleep:  _________________________________________         Appetite:  ________________________ Allergies (Drug/Food/Latex/Environmental/Herbal): ___________________________________ Current perception of Health: Excellent Good Fair Poor

1

1 3 Awakening the DNP Spirit of the Scientific Underpinnings Your Name (without credentials) Miami Regional University DNP7100: Evaluation of Evidence for Practice Professor Name Month, Year Title (Introduction – not labeled ‘Introduction’) Introduce your topic of interest for practice change and its general area of either (a) clinical outcomes,

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis

  Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.  Include the

  Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.  Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge:  Reflect on your learning experience. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact?  How do you envision using the concepts learned in this

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a list of health care-acquired conditions (HACs) that reasonably could have been prevent

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a list of health care-acquired conditions (HACs) that reasonably could have been prevented through the application of risk management strategies. What actions has your health care organization (or have health care organizations in general) implemented to manage or prevent these “never

need help with a developing nursing course assignment Home / My courses / 2025_APR_SIMPATH_BSN436-SIM_1139225 / Module Two: Internal and

need help with a developing nursing course assignment Home / My courses / 2025_APR_SIMPATH_BSN436-SIM_1139225 / Module Two: Internal and External Environmental Forces that Affect Critical Thinking and Patient Centered Care / Assignment 1 Instructions, Rubric and Submission area 2025_APR_SIMPATH_BSN436-SIM_Developing Nursing Practice_2 Assignment 1 Instructions, Rubric and Submission area To do: