GROWTH CHART ANALYSIS As a pediatric nurse practitioner, it is essential that you analyze the growth chart and explain the findings to parents so

GROWTH CHART ANALYSIS

As a pediatric nurse practitioner, it is essential that you analyze the growth chart and explain the findings to parents so that you can provide guidance in the form of a healthcare plan.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Important video —-

TO PREPARE

· Review this week’s readings and resources along with Week 8.

· Research and review online pediatric growth charts.

THE ASSIGNMENT: 2–3 MINUTE VIDEO

A 7-year-old male patient comes into your office for a well exam. The child is 47.5 inches tall and weighs 65 lbs. 

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9

Use Kaltura to create a 2–3-minute video where you, as the pediatric nurse practitioner, explain the child’s growth chart to the parent. Use the appropriate growth chart (you can share your screen to refer to the chart) to explain the child’s height-for-age and weight-for-age percentiles as well as his BMI, including his percentile. Determine the diagnosis and explain to the parent whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese. Share a treatment plan and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

At the beginning of the video, show your ID and introduce/identify yourself by showing your face. Create a video posing as if you are speaking to the parent. You can print the growth chart or use screen sharing to go over it with the parent. Make sure that you record your face using the “camera” recording option in Kaltura.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

To submit your video response entry:

1. Click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

2. Next, click 
Text Entry and then click the 
Embed Kaltura Media button.

3. Select your recorded video under My Media.

4. Check the box for the End-User License Agreement and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

NRNP_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAt the beginning of video, shows ID and introduces/identifies self. Shows face on video.

10 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes height-for-age percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes stature-for-age percentiles

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

Does not include stature-for-age percentiles

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes weight-for-age percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes weight-for-age percentiles

5 to >2.0 pts

Good

Does not include weight-for-age percentiles

2 to >0.0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes BMI percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes BMI percentiles

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

Does not include BMI percentiles

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides a diagnosis and explains to the parent whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly and fully explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese but the response is vague, unclear, or incomplete.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Insufficient or missing explanation of whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShares treatment plan and suggestions for future steps for parent.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly and fully explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent, but the response is vague, unclear, or incomplete.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Insufficient or missing explanation of diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUses a professional and friendly demeanor.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Consistently uses a professional and friendly demeanor while maintaining eye contact.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately uses a professional and friendly demeanor while maintaining eye contact.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Use of a professional and friendly demeanor is inconsistent. Eye contact is not maintainred throughout video.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not use a professional and friendly demeanor.

15 pts

Total Points: 100

Rubric

NRNP_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6541_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAt the beginning of video, shows ID and introduces/identifies self. Shows face on video.

10 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes height-for-age percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes stature-for-age percentiles

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

Does not include stature-for-age percentiles

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes weight-for-age percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes weight-for-age percentiles

5 to >2.0 pts

Good

Does not include weight-for-age percentiles

2 to >0.0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes BMI percentiles

15 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Includes BMI percentiles

5 to >0.0 pts

Good

Does not include BMI percentiles

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Poor

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides a diagnosis and explains to the parent whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly and fully explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Explains whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese but the response is vague, unclear, or incomplete.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Insufficient or missing explanation of whether the child is underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShares treatment plan and suggestions for future steps for parent.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly and fully explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Explains diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent, but the response is vague, unclear, or incomplete.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Insufficient or missing explanation of diagnoses and suggestions for future steps for the parent.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUses a professional and friendly demeanor.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Consistently uses a professional and friendly demeanor while maintaining eye contact.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Adequately uses a professional and friendly demeanor while maintaining eye contact.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Use of a professional and friendly demeanor is inconsistent. Eye contact is not maintainred throughout video.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not use a professional and friendly demeanor.

15 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram illustration which highlights trends in family relationships,

This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram illustration which highlights trends in family relationships, marital status, family issues, family patterns of mental illness, and substance abuse. Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria: 1. Complete a 5-6 page in-depth analysis of the information gained

This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram illustration which highlights trends in family relationships,

This scholarly paper is an interpretive analysis of the comprehensive genogram illustration which highlights trends in family relationships, marital status, family issues, family patterns of mental illness, and substance abuse. Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria: 1. Complete a 5-6 page in-depth analysis of the information gained

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the