Criterion 1 Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and

Criterion 1

Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Distinguished

Summarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. Notes the rationale for pursing the issue, as well as a gap contributing to it.

Proficient

Summarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Basic

Provides an unclear or incomplete summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Non Performance

Does not provide any type of summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Criterion 2

Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.

Distinguished

Identifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations. Supports assertion by using at least one piece of evidence (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resource).

Proficient

Identifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.

Basic

Identifies disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue. However, does not relate the disparities to any socioeconomic or diversity considerations.

Non Performance

Does not identify any disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue.

Criterion 3

Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

Distinguished

Explains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans. Cites at least four relevant evidence-based or scholarly sources to support explanation.

Proficient

Explains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

Basic

Identifies the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources, but the relevance to regarding the need to address the chosen issue is unclear or misaligned.

Non Performance

Does not identify the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources.

Criterion 4

Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.

Distinguished

Explains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.

Proficient

Explains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.

Basic

Identifies possible outcomes and opportunities of growth, but their relationship to the proposed change or implementation plan is unclear.

Non Performance

Does not identify possible outcomes and opportunities of growth.

Criterion 5

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Distinguished

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.

Proficient

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Attempts to apply APA style and formatting.

Basic

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

Non Performance

Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical experiences. Expand All Introduction An understanding of one’s own approaches to leadership, motivation, collaboration, and ethical situations is important to the evolution of an effective leader. An introspective lens can help

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict resolution style to use. Explain conflict negotiation strategies and determine the likely outcomes. Instructions: Review the following scenario and develop conflict resolution strategies for employees: You are part

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the

discuss mood stabilizers  Assignment:   Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing  EACH of the four traditional mood stabilizer

discuss mood stabilizers  Assignment:   Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing  EACH of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with  five (5) evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature. Note: APA style format will apply. Your paper should include the following for each: · Proposed mechanism