instructions attached Create a body of evidence (Evaluation Table) to compare the three studies you appraised in weeks 4 and 5. See the evaluation

instructions attached

Create a body of evidence (Evaluation Table) to compare the three studies you appraised in weeks 4 and 5. See the evaluation table templates  D1 and D2 (linked below) for examples.

In weeks 4 and 5, you completed the critical appraisal of three studies. This week, you will meld these studies into a synthesis upon which to base practice and standards of care. To create this synthesis, you’ll compare the three studies using an 
“Evaluation Table” that
 includes the following:

1. Citation: Author, Date of Publication, & Title  

2. Purpose of Study  

3. Conceptual Framework  

4. Design/ Method  

5. Sample/Setting  

6. Major Variables Studied and Their Definitions  

7. Measurement of Major Variables  

8. Data Analysis  

9. Study Findings  

10. Worth to Practice:  

11. Level of Evidence

12. Strengths/Weaknesses  

13. Feasibility  

14. Conclusion  

Your PICOT question is the driver for the evaluation table and synthesis tables. For example, with data analysis, while many statistics may be reported in a study, only those statistics that assist you in answering your clinical question should be placed in the table. Also, only the findings relevant to the clinical question should be placed in the table. Keeping the order of information placed in the table clear and simple is imperative for comparisons across studies for synthesis.  

Some suggestions to make the table user-friendly are to:

(a) use abbreviations (e.g., RCT) with a legend for interpretation,
(b) keep the order of the information the same in each study, and
(c) place similar statistics in the same order in each study for easy comparison.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

738.2.1 : Foundations of Inquiry The learner differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence-based practice, and research.

738.2.1 : Foundations of Inquiry The learner differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence-based practice, and research. 738.2.2 :  Literature Review and Analysis The learner demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review. 738.2.3 :  Ethics and Research The learner demonstrates an understanding of the ethics of nursing research particularly human

1. Demonstrate competency in medication administration incorporating pharmacological principles. Answer the following questions directly on this

1. Demonstrate competency in medication administration incorporating pharmacological principles. Answer the following questions directly on this document. Please make sure to open the Word document underneath number 1. Please patient 1. Please refer to the following document about safe medication administration: 2. Discuss how you used the nursing process during

attached is the previous smart goals that was submitted, rubric, assignment details SMART Goals for PMHNP Clinical Rotation Jachai

attached is the previous smart goals that was submitted, rubric, assignment details SMART Goals for PMHNP Clinical Rotation Jachai Littlejohn St. Thomas University NUR-640CL-AP3 Dr. Howard March 23, 2025 Introduction SMART goals guide professional skill development. Focus on psychiatric evaluations and communication. Enhance evidence-based psychotherapy techniques application. Improve documentation and