Please see attachment Instructions Critically Appraise the Evidence  Submission Type: 6-to-8-page paper that includes three appraisal appendices

Please see attachment

Instructions

Critically Appraise the Evidence 

Submission Type: 6-to-8-page paper that includes three appraisal appendices at the end.

Details:


Last week, you identified a few quantitative research studies to help answer your PICOT question. In this two-week assignment, you will critically appraise three of the studies to evaluate the evidence they offer. At least one study must be a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Examples of rapid critical appraisal checklists that can be used for different types of quantitative studies are linked at the bottom of this assignment. Each critical appraisal will address the (1) validity, (2) reliability, and (3) applicability of the study.

After appraising the three studies, write a paper addressing each study’s validity, reliability, and applicability. Use APA formatting and include an introduction and conclusion. Be sure to include a reference page and appendix with copies of the completed critical appraisal checklists for each of the three studies.

This assignment should be no more than 6-8 pages (not including the title or references pages) and include the following components: 

1.

1. Title Page

2. Introduction: include a summary of the primary intent of your paper 

3. For each of the three studies, use the appropriate appraisal tool, address all items, and include detailed write-ups for:

A. The validity of the study,

B. The reliability of the study,

C. The applicability of the study.

4. Conclusion

5. Reference Page

6. Appendix

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical experiences. Expand All Introduction An understanding of one’s own approaches to leadership, motivation, collaboration, and ethical situations is important to the evolution of an effective leader. An introspective lens can help

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict resolution style to use. Explain conflict negotiation strategies and determine the likely outcomes. Instructions: Review the following scenario and develop conflict resolution strategies for employees: You are part

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the

discuss mood stabilizers  Assignment:   Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing  EACH of the four traditional mood stabilizer

discuss mood stabilizers  Assignment:   Construct a 5- to 6-page paper discussing  EACH of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with  five (5) evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature. Note: APA style format will apply. Your paper should include the following for each: · Proposed mechanism