Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice Complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in

Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice

Complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.

Your presentation should:

1.
 Identify and select a screening tool 
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice. 
3. Provide recommendations.

· APA style including citation of references.

· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) 
scholarly journal articles or 
primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. 

· PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides

· Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical analysis. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: Review the assigned chapters in Polit and Beck (2017): i.e., chapters 18-20. Identify five different facts or pieces of information that

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal