Self-Study: Comparing Counts (Chi Square) Throughout the course, there will be a self-study Discussion pertaining to an important concept or

 Self-Study: Comparing Counts (Chi Square)

Throughout the course, there will be a self-study Discussion pertaining to an important concept or topic covered within the assigned week. These Discussions are designed to give you the opportunity to collaborate with your peers and faculty, test your knowledge, ask questions, practice research analysis, and assist your peers.  
 
You are not required to post to this forum; however, you are encouraged to post, review the posts of others, as well as answer questions and/or provide clarity and collaboration with your peers. Discussions will be graded as either Complete or Incomplete. 

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Required Resources

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model & guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

· Chapter 6, “Evidence of Appraisal: Research” (pp. 254–267) 

· Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2019). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

· Chapter 5, “Creating Graphs: A Picture Really Is Worth a Thousand Words” (pp. 110–115) 

· Chapter 18, “Chi-Square and Some Other Nonparametric Tests: What to Do When You’re Not Normal” (pp. 337–342, 345–346)

·
Document: 
Creating Charts in Excel (Excel)
Download Creating Charts in Excel (Excel)

·
Document: 
Critical Assessment, Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool (Word document)
Download Critical Assessment, Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool (Word document)

·
Document: 
Critical Assessment, Appendix G: Individual Evidence Summary Tool (Word document)
Download Critical Assessment, Appendix G: Individual Evidence Summary Tool (Word document)

Required Media

· Niedz, B. (2024). Inferential comparison of counts (chi square) [Video]. Walden University Canvas.

Optional Resources

· Conner, C. (2018). 

Evaluating the impact of an early warning scoring system in a community hospital settingLinks to an external site.
 (Publication No. 10747387) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Moradkhani, B., Mollazadeh, S., Niloofar, P., Bashiri, A., & Oghazian, M. B. (2021). 
Association between medication adherence and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseLinks to an external site.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 7(1).

· Owusu, M. (2023). 

Language barrier: An unmet challenge for low screening of colorectal cancer among Hispanic Americans in TexasLinks to an external site.
 (Publication No. 30567908) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

To prepare:

· Read and view the Learning Resources.

Use this Discussion to collaborate with your peers and faculty as an open office hours/ Q&A forum. 

Post answers to the following:

· Find the Chi Sq in Moradkhani et al. (2021), Conner (2018), or Owusu (2023) from the Optional Resources, and critique its use in the study. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

NUR4681CBE Section 01CBE Global Health (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2025 Spring Quarter Deliverable 4 – High-risk and Vulnerable Global

NUR4681CBE Section 01CBE Global Health (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2025 Spring Quarter Deliverable 4 – High-risk and Vulnerable Global Populations Assignment Instructions Competency Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable

For this assessment, you will complete an evidence-based patient-centered needs assessment of prospective health care technology that will improve

For this assessment, you will complete an evidence-based patient-centered needs assessment of prospective health care technology that will improve patient engagement. You will write a 4-5 page paper explaining the process and considerations that went into completing the patient needs assessment. Expand All Introduction Evidence-based practice is a key skill

COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES Therapeutic

COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES Therapeutic Techniques Examples Use silence – (Sitting quietly and appearing interested but no verbal communication. Pausing while client gathers thoughts) Give recognition – Good evening John, or Mr. . . . · Thank you for helping around . . . Demonstrate acceptance – Yes . . . ·

Geriatric Care Plan Concept Map Risk Factors for Nursing Diagnosis (3) 1.

Geriatric Care Plan Concept Map Risk Factors for Nursing Diagnosis (3) 1. Dementia 2. Lung disease 3. Recent viral illness Complications to Report (3) 1. Weight loss 2. Falls 3. Dizziness Challenges to Implementing Care Plan (3) 1. Resident’s mental capacity 2. Time 3. Etc. Things I Learned/Surprised Me After