See Attachment Response 6ab WHAT : REPLY to the TWO Discussion Posts FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List REFERENCES : TWO

See Attachment

Response 6ab

WHAT : REPLY to the TWO Discussion Posts

FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List

REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years 

INCLUDE : Turnitin Report

* Please and THANK YOU *

_______________________

AbDj 

Discussion Post Reply #1 

Primary sources of research are immediately available observations regarding a topic
obtained from people with direct experience. This can include but not limited to a
textbook, an article, and journals. A primary source makes available firsthand evidence
with original data.

An overview or comprehensive analysis of previous research is referred to as a
literature review. A literature review has a purpose to get a better understanding of
specific research.

According to an article wrote by Maeda et al. (2021), “systematic review is a
‘methodology used systematically to search for and synthesize knowledge generated
through empirical studies to inform policy and decision-making and to uncover hidden
patterns or trends that exist among relevant studies’(Grant & Booth, 2009)”. This
approach is usually used to minimized bias in summarizing research and is a form of
secondary research.

A meta-analysis is a “statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of
studies that produce a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true
magnitude of an effect” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p. 171). A systematic review
involves many studies to address a specific clinical question while avoiding bias, and
meta-analysis is used to analyze the studies into one result.

TaFri 

Discussion Post Reply #2 

Primary sources of research include the original data collected by the researcher or the
feelings and interpretation of the research by participants (Schuurman & Eijkman,
2013). However secondary sources include interpretations of research by other authors
(Schuurman & Eijkman, 2013). Sources of primary studies include CINAHL, Embase,
ERIC, and Medline (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). These sources are usually
accessible through institutions or personal subscriptions.

Literature reviews include a defined topic and research question, they provide a
summary of the literature emphasizing what is known in the literature and then provides
an overview summary of the research questions (Dodgeson, 2023). The researcher
should identify literature that can help them to answer the research question (Mathew,
2022). They should then summarize the knowledge found in the literature and can
further apply the review to their research (Dodgeson, 2023).

Systematic reviews are studies that use systematic search of literature and further
summarize primary research in away that is nonbiased (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,
202). Systematic reviews are seen as superior to primary sources due to the limited
bias in systematic reviews (Mathew, 2022). The key aspects of systematic reviews
include: ask (PICOT or research question), access (obtaining literature to answer
research question), assimilate (find strategies that were used to synthesize primary
research studies), appraise (includes a critical appraisal of literature studies), analyze
(analyze descriptive and quantitative data), and apply (explain how findings can be
applied to patients) (Mathew, 2022).

Meta-analysis is pulling data from different individual studies (Mathew, 2022). The data
may be presented via graphs or plots to allow the reader to easily understand the data.
The meta-analysis includes six questions to help the reader further understand the
data. These include: what is the comparison, what outcome is being compared, how is
the data presented, what statistical model is used, what is the pooled effect, and what
is the heterogeneity (Mathew, 2022).

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Help responding to collegues  Please respond to the following colleagues AS Angela

Help responding to collegues  Please respond to the following colleagues AS Angela Stapleton-Burley Jun 25 10:56pm Manage Discussion by Angela Stapleton-Burley Reply from Angela Stapleton-Burley   Hi Everoyne, One significant benefit of incorporating big data into clinical systems is the enhancement of predictive analytics, which allows providers to proactively identify

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to assess your ability to conduct a systematic and comprehensive head-to-toe physical assessment. This will

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to assess your ability to conduct a systematic and comprehensive head-to-toe physical assessment. This will help reinforce critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and documentation skills essential for nursing practice. By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate proficiency in assessing various body systems, identifying normal

COMPLETE USING DOCUMENT POSTED WITH ASSIGNMENT Thumbnails/thumbnail.png Determining Anesthesia Service Payments and Modifiers As a new medical

COMPLETE USING DOCUMENT POSTED WITH ASSIGNMENT Thumbnails/thumbnail.png Determining Anesthesia Service Payments and Modifiers As a new medical coder for an Anesthesiologist group, it is important that you practice calculating service payments by assigning the appropriate anesthesia code(s) and modifier(s), as well as determining the base and time unit values, any

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS Thumbnails/thumbnail.png 1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN

COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS Thumbnails/thumbnail.png 1) The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are approved by the FILL IN BLANK  parties for ICD-10-CM to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within ICD-10-CM. 2) Official coding guidelines use the term FILL IN BLANK  when referring to face-to-face contact between patients and health