NSG 468: Influencing Quality Within Healthcare Summative Assessment: Quality Improvement and


NSG 468: Influencing Quality Within Healthcare

Summative Assessment: Quality Improvement and Safety Case Study

The Scenario

In an effort to continuously improve quality and safety, your manager has asked you to share one example of patient care from your experience. Your and other team members’ submissions will be used to help facilitate an upcoming training.

In a 700- to 875-word case study, 
address the following:

· Identify a patient care case from your own practice experience that involves quality and safety. 
Note: If you are not practicing or have not practiced, use a case that has received media attention or one from the textbook.

· Summarize the situation.

· Describe your (or the nurse’s) role in the patient care situation.

· Explain the role the patient played in their own quality- or safety-related situation.

· Evaluate the relationship between the patient’s care and the outcome.

· Identify how the care environment affected the situation, including the nurse or provider, the patient, and the outcome.

· Determine whether a quality model was employed. If yes, identify and explain it. If not, identify one that could have improved the situation.

· Explain what actions you might take to improve the outcome or prevent an adverse outcome in the future.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

**Include 3 references that are from past 5 years – APA 7th edition

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal