XL4003 Performance Task Submission Template for Module 1, Part 1: Professional Nursing Organizations Choose one to two (1–2)

XL4003 Performance Task Submission Template for Module 1, Part 1: Professional Nursing Organizations

Choose one to two (1–2) professional organizations relevant to your interests and sign up to
stay informed about legislative and political advocacy to advance patient care and the nursing profession.

You may also find nursing organizations relevant to your local state or community that are not listed in the Module 1 Learning Activities. Consider subscribing to or enrolling in a professional organization of your choice.

Respond to the following questions:

1. What organization(s) did you choose to sign up with so that you may stay informed about relevant policy issues and why?

Type your answer here . . .

2. How do national nursing organizations elevate the political voice of the nurses?

Type your answer here . . .

3. Describe an issue from an organization’s policy agenda perspective that relies on research data.

Type your answer here . . .

4. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using research in policy advocacy?

Type your answer here . . .

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal