follow all directions  HCM 700 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric Prompt For Milestone Four, you will submit a dra� of your planning sec�on.

follow all directions 

HCM 700 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt

For Milestone Four, you will submit a dra� of your planning sec�on. You will provide a comprehensive program plan that includes its objec�ves (i.e., measurable improvements in behavior,

performance, process, or a tangible item that will result from your program); ethical and legal considera�ons, including a review of the four ethical principles, ensuring appropriate legal and

social responsibility of your proposal; financial considera�ons and their an�cipated effect on internal policy and opera�ons; an�cipated issue-related outcomes and your plan to address

them; and a �meline for mee�ng program objec�ves.

Specifically, the following cri�cal elements must be addressed:

IV. Planning

Provide a comprehensive program plan that includes the following:

Objec�ves that are measurable improvements in behavior, performance, process, or a tangible item that will result from your program. The objec�ves should not be just a list of

ac�vi�es needed to achieve the final goals but should be markers for how to measure the success of the proposal a�er implementa�on. Refer to the module resources on cra�ing

SMART goals for support.

Ethical and legal considera�ons, including a review of the four ethical principles (autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and jus�ce), ensuring appropriate social responsibility

of your proposal.

Financial considera�ons, including any poten�al financial impact your proposal will have for the organiza�on and an evalua�on of the required resources to implement and

sustain your proposal.

An�cipated issues-related outcomes and your plan to address them. Be sure to address the an�cipated effect on internal policy and opera�ons.

A �meline for mee�ng program objec�ves.

What to Submit

The dra� of your planning sec�on should be submi�ed as a 2- to 3-page Microso� Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Any

references should be cited in APA format. Use appropriate headings to iden�fy each cri�cal element.



Milestone Four Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Objec�ves Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a high level of

understanding of measurable

objec�ves

Create measurable objec�ves

of the program proposal that

can be used as markers for

success of the proposal

Creates the objec�ves of the

program proposal but they are

not measurable

Does not create the objec�ves

of the program proposal

19

Ethical and Legal

Considera�ons

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a firm grasp of

the ethical and legal

considera�ons

Describes the ethical and legal

considera�ons and their

an�cipated effect on the

proposal

Describes the ethical and legal

considera�ons but not their

an�cipated effect on the

proposal

Does not describe the ethical

and legal considera�ons

19

Financial Considera�ons Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a strong

understanding of the financial

impact of the proposal on the

organiza�on

Discusses the financial impact

of the proposal on the

organiza�on, including

evalua�on of the required

resources to support the

success of the program

Discusses the financial impact

of the proposal on the

organiza�on, but misses

important details

Does not discuss the financial

impact of the proposal on the

organiza�on

19

An�cipated Issues-Related

Outcomes

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a firm grasp on

the an�cipated issues-related

outcomes and ways to address

them

Discusses the an�cipated

issues-related outcomes and

ways to address them

Discusses the an�cipated

issues-related outcomes but

doesn’t discuss the ways to

address them or misses other

important details

Does not discuss the

an�cipated issues-related

outcomes and ways to address

them

19

Timeline Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a strong

understanding of project

planning

Includes an appropriate and

realis�c �meline for mee�ng

program objec�ves

Includes a �meline for mee�ng

program objec�ves but it is

unrealis�c or missing important

details

Does not include a �meline for

mee�ng program objec�ves

14

Ar�cula�on of Response Submission is free of errors

related to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

organiza�on and is presented

in a professional and easy-to-

read format

Submission has no major errors

related to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organiza�on

Submission has major errors

related to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organiza�on

that nega�vely impact

readability and ar�cula�on of

main ideas

Submission has cri�cal errors

related to cita�ons, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organiza�on

that prevent understanding of

ideas

10

Total: 100%

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Mitz week 6 soap  SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

Mitz week 6 soap  SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

roch week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

roch week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

BM week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

BM week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

Bb week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University

Bb week 6 soap SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

  For this week’s discussion, you will take a closer look at findings from your population health assessment & prevention project.    Identify the

  For this week’s discussion, you will take a closer look at findings from your population health assessment & prevention project.    Identify the role of your collaborating healthcare professional and share a needed change the two of you identified in your assessment.   Identify a community stakeholder or policy maker that could support the recommended change. What resources might be needed?  Provide a paragraph