Journal Entry   Journal Entry 3 Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and

 Journal Entry  

Journal Entry 3

Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and needs to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area, and this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.

Submit your Assignment by Day 3 of Week 11.

 

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCE

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). 
Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 6, “Evidence Appraisal: Research” (pp. 129–162)

· Appendices

· Kearney, M. H. (2015). 
Moving from facts to wisdom: Facilitating synthesis in literature reviewsLinks to an external site.
Research in Nursing and Health
39(1), 3–6.

· Wakefield, A. (2015). 
Synthesizing the literature as part of a literature reviewLinks to an external site.
Nursing Standard
18(29), 44–51. doi:10.7748/ns.29.29.44.e8957

·
Document: 
Evidence Synthesis and Recommendation Form
 Download Evidence Synthesis and Recommendation Form(Microsoft Word document)

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week11_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week11_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the practicum experience hours completed.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete the Practicum Time Log.

40 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 6 Assignment: Nursing Informatics Project Proposal Your Name Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University Nursing 8210: Transforming

Week 6 Assignment: Nursing Informatics Project Proposal Your Name Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University Nursing 8210: Transforming Nursing Instructor Name Month XX, 202X Introduction Content: Brief introduction to the project requirements and objectives Formatting Notes: Choose formatting that presents your information in the most logical way. You may

Help responding to collegues  Please respond to the following colleagues AS Angela

Help responding to collegues  Please respond to the following colleagues AS Angela Stapleton-Burley Jun 25 10:56pm Manage Discussion by Angela Stapleton-Burley Reply from Angela Stapleton-Burley   Hi Everoyne, One significant benefit of incorporating big data into clinical systems is the enhancement of predictive analytics, which allows providers to proactively identify