Special Considerations for Patient Populations Paper  · · Patient 1: 82-year-old male presenting with cognitive

Special Considerations for Patient Populations Paper 

·

·
Patient 1: 82-year-old male presenting with cognitive decline. He had always been a very active individual. Over the past year, he has become less active in the community. Previously, he played cribbage weekly with friends at the local senior center but has been struggling with the math involved with the game and no longer attends the weekly card game. He had also volunteered as a crossing guard for the local public school. He quit doing that after he took the wrong turn to get home and drove around the town feeling lost. He acknowledges he is “sensitive” to this and can be irritable towards his children when they bring up these concerns. He was diagnosed with mild neurocognitive disorder after completing neuropsychological testing. Of the following medications, which would be the most appropriate to prescribe? Explain why you chose this medication. What would be the dosing schedule for this patient? Provide education to the patient and review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication. In addition, explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient. 
Med List: lorazepam, olanzapine, memantine

Construct a paper concerning your assigned vulnerable population patient case. In your paper include the following:

· Determine which medication would be most appropriate to prescribe from the assigned vulnerable population patient case medication choices.

· Explain your rationale for choosing this medication. Explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient.

· Explain the dosing schedule for the specific patient including the therapeutic endpoint.

· Provide necessary education to the patient to review risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the medication.

· Describe any necessary labs or additional diagnostics needed prior to prescribing this medication.

· Explain how you might monitor efficacy or side effects of the medication.

· Include any additional collaboration or education to others that would be necessary for this patient. Consider family members, home health care, primary care providers, etc.

· What would you need to include in your assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with your prescribing plan for your scenario? What are alternative treatment solutions based upon how you assessed? Describe your new treatment plan.

This Assignment requires a minimum of 
five (5) peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.

Note: You will need to include the APA style formattin

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical

  Questions Discussion Board: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you the complexity of quantitative statistical analysis. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: Review the assigned chapters in Polit and Beck (2017): i.e., chapters 18-20. Identify five different facts or pieces of information that

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you

follow instuuctions attached  Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 1 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. OAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.   S =  Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or

***CASE STUDIES ATTACHED*** You should respond to both discussions separately–with constructive literature material- extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts.  Minimum 150 words each reply with references under each reply.  Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal