You are required to deliver a presentation which demonstrates your understanding of perspectives in psychology. Your presentation must include the

You are required to deliver a presentation which demonstrates your understanding of perspectives in psychology.

Your presentation must include the following:-
• A description of two psychological perspectives.
• An evaluation of the key assumptions of the identified psychological perspectives.
• An evaluation of the work of key theorists relating to each of the identified psychological perspectives.
• An analysis of the similarities and differences between two perspectives in psychology.
• An evaluation of the application of two perspectives to contemporary issues in psychology.

GUIDANCE

You will need to produce a set of presentation slides using PowerPoint or similar software. You can then use these to support the delivery of your presentation. A copy of the slides you have produced will need to be submitted for marking.

Refer to the study materials in the ‘Academic Writing Skills’ unit for detailed guidance as to how to structure, produce and deliver a presentation.

Any notes that you have used to support the delivery of your presentation must also be submitted.

Your presentation will need to be video recorded, and the relevant file submitted as part of your assignment. The video must clearly show you delivering the presentation with your slides in the background. Voice over only is not accepted.

You must not embed your video file into the presentation slides in the form of short clips embedded in each slide. The recording of your delivering the presentation must be one continuous video.

How to record your presentation video is shown in the link below.

Your presentation should be a maximum of 20 minutes in duration.

Refer to pages 13-14 of your course handbook for guidance as to how to upload your video file to the system.

Relevant theory must be referenced where appropriate and a references list provided. Your presentation should also contain appropriate images to support your commentary. If these are taken from published sources, they must be referenced accordingly.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical

hi Write a 3–4 page response to an employment questionnaire requiring a self-evaluation of your leadership, collaboration, and ethical experiences. Expand All Introduction An understanding of one’s own approaches to leadership, motivation, collaboration, and ethical situations is important to the evolution of an effective leader. An introspective lens can help

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict

Develop a 3–4 page plan to identify the causes of organizational conflict, explain how conflict affects an organization, and select a conflict resolution style to use. Explain conflict negotiation strategies and determine the likely outcomes. Instructions: Review the following scenario and develop conflict resolution strategies for employees: You are part

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Systematic reviews are an umbrella term for a number of different review designs, all with specific goals (e.g., identify scope of available research or gaps, reduce bias, statistically combine and analyze results from multiple studies). They differ from basic literature review articles that qualitatively summarize the