Describe a moment when you felt something was being revealed to you—through nature, a conversation, a work of art, or an experience. How does this help

Describe a moment when you felt something was being revealed to you—through nature, a conversation, a work of art, or an experience. How does this help you think about Johnson’s idea of God’s Spirit active in evolution and Dei Verbum’s claim that God “speaks to us as friends”? What tension do you see between personal experience and communal tradition in the way revelation works?

Guidelines

These discussions are designed to create collaborative and genuine engagement with big ideas—not “right” answers or summaries. Here’s what I’m looking for:

Your Initial Post:

Make it specific. Share a concrete insight, story, question, or connection. Show us how you’re thinking with it.

Connect ideas; refer to a reading or concept from the module to share how it intersects with your own experiences or questions.

Use your voice. We’re here to hear your perspective — what surprised, challenged, or moved you?

For Peer Responses:

Move the conversation forward. Don’t just agree — add a new angle, pose a question, share a related experience, or offer a respectful challenge.

  • Write as if you’re having a meaningful conversation in person — clear, curious, and sincere. It’s okay to express uncertainty or ask questions.

Stay constructive and respectful. Disagreement is constructive only when its gentle and respectful — dismissiveness or sarcasm isn’t.

There’s no word count, but aim for a post that says something real — something you’ve thought about and that invites others to respond. If it feels like a tweet, it’s too short. If it’s a sermon, it’s probably too long. Think middle ground: reflective, clear, and conversational.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

The purpose of this assignment is to apply what you’ve learned about interpretive analysis and the visual arts by writing a reasonable and

The purpose of this assignment is to apply what you’ve learned about interpretive analysis and the visual arts by writing a reasonable and convincing INTERPRETIVE ANALYSIS of a work of visual art, practice using form and content evidence to support your reasonable and convincing interpretation by integrating the descriptions you wrote for a painting from

Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not

Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. Details: Using the Unit III Assignment Template, write a dialogue (short conversation) between two people. Keys to

Connecting standards to content is already a vital component of instruction. Building on this, we will further our expertise through the integration of

Connecting standards to content is already a vital component of instruction. Building on this, we will further our expertise through the integration of critical thinking, reflection and metacognition, and provisions for equity in instruction. Choose 1 content standard that develops and promotes critical thinking. Write a minimum 525-word essay in

Click this link to watch the 2012 Cracknell production of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House.

Click this link to watch the 2012 Cracknell production of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. https://edu.digitaltheatreplus.com/content/productions/a-dolls-house-digital-theatreTo log in, click the blue “sign on” button enter the following: email/user: spcollege and password: GoTitans1927 GO OVER QUESTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA BEFORE WATCHING THE FILM! Grading Criteria  All your answers must be in your own words, accurately reflect