The “Marihuana” tax act, along with the Harrison Narcotics Act, were not born from careful examination of an accumulation of evidence. Indeed, the strong opinions of reformists, and a cabal of powerful “anti-druggist” physicians and state and federal legislators were the primary catalysts for complete prohibition. Using context and examples from the readings, explain why this was problematic, and more broadly, why basing any policy solely on public opinion is problematic.
Please answer both of the following discussion questions: (Normally Due Thursday of Week 1; Note for Week 1 only the initial discussion responses may be
Please answer both of the following discussion questions: (Normally Due Thursday of Week 1; Note for Week 1 only the initial discussion responses may be posted as late as Sunday and still be considered on time):1: List and briefly discuss the eight attributes of Organized Crime (OC). Then justify which of the