2 Learning Design Check-in for EmpowerEd The Google Classroom training module will be delivered in person at a community

2

Learning Design Check-in for EmpowerEd

The Google Classroom training module will be delivered in person at a community center over four hours, with a catered lunch to encourage teamwork. This medium shows that 65% of teachers choose hands-on learning (EmpowerEd, 2025). Educators will receive a PDF handbook before the training that goes over the basics of Google Classroom and EmpowerEd’s mission. This will help the organization stay on the same page. An ed-tech expert led the session, which included demonstrations, practice, and group discussions, all based on andragogical concepts (Finley, 2010).

The in-person model fits with EmpowerEd’s goal of providing useful professional development that lets teachers practice skills in a safe space. This is important for the 70% who said they didn’t get enough training. It helps teachers reach their objective of encouraging new ways of teaching by giving them the tools to make interesting, tech-based classes for a wide range of students. To solve scheduling problems caused by teachers’ schedules, a Doodle poll will be sent out by email to confirm a day within two weeks. If it isn’t possible to present in person, a live Zoom workshop with breakout rooms is an option, although it might not be as engaging. A self-paced online module is a last resort because it doesn’t allow for cooperation (Levett-Jones, 2005). A post-workshop survey measuring satisfaction and a 45-day classroom observation evaluating skill application will be used to see if the program is effective. This will make sure that it fits with EmpowerEd’s goals of being open to everyone.
To solve scheduling problems caused by teachers’ schedules, a Doodle poll will be sent out by email to confirm a day within two weeks. If it isn’t possible to present in person, a live Zoom workshop with breakout rooms is an option, although it might not be as engaging. A self-paced online module is a last resort because it doesn’t allow for cooperation (Levett-Jones, 2005)

References

EmpowerEd. (2025).
Mission & vision.

Finley, J. (2010). Andragogy (Adult Learning). [Video]. YouTube.

Levett-Jones, T. L. (2005). Self-directed learning: Implications and limitations for undergraduate nursing education.
Nurse Education Today, 25(5), 363–368.

Noe, R. A. (2018).
Employee training and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS

PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT POWERPOINT PRESENTATION PROJECT TOPICS · Product Liability · General Motors · Philip Morris · Remington Rifle Models 700 & 710 · Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer · Exploding Coca-Cola · Blitz Gas Cans · Most Innovative & Famous Leaders · Reed Hastings – Netflix · Evan Spiegel –

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall organizational performance. In this discussion thread, we will explore the importance of employee development from a human resource management perspective and some common types of employee development such as mentorship, coaching, and

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of