Week 1. Discussion 2 The Practice and History of Industrial/Organizational Psychology As you begin exploring the

Week 1. Discussion 2 The Practice and History of Industrial/Organizational Psychology

As you begin exploring the history of I/O psychology, you will see that it serves several purposes. First, it will provide an understanding of how contemporary theories and practices came to be. Second, it will also provide insight into mistakes that were made and should be avoided in the future. Third, it will help you understand how economic, social, and political factors have shaped and will continue to shape the discipline.

Learning Resources:


Required Readings

Introduction to I/O Psychology: History and Theories

· Campbell, J. P. & Wilmot, M. P. (2018). The functioning of theory in industrial, work, and organizational psychology (IWOP). In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), 


The SAGE handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology

Links to an external site.
 (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-38). London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd. 

·
Note: Volume 1, Chapter 1, Read pages 3-14 only

·
Time Estimate: 60 minutes

· Zickar, M., & Austin, J. (2018). History of industrial work and organizational psychology in North America. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), 


The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychologyLinks to an external site.

 (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 3-42). London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd.

·
Note: Volume 2, Chapter 1

·
Time Estimate: 85 minutes


I/O PSYCHOLOGY CAREER INFORMATION

· Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (n.d.). 

Career paths for industrial-organizational psychologistsLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved from

·
Time Estimate: 15 minutes

· Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (n.d.). 
SIOP surveysLinks to an external site..

·
Time Estimate: 20 minutes

To prepare for this Discussion:

· Review the video, “I v. O in I/O Psychology.” Consider the differences between industrial and organizational psychology.

· Review and Chapter 1 in Volume 3 of 
The SAGE Handbook. Pay particular attention to the major historical developments in the evolution of I/O psychology.

· Reflect on one historical development you think has impacted contemporary practice the most, and consider how and why.

INSTRUCTIONS: Responsd to the following:

· Differentiate between industrial psychology and organizational psychology.

· Describe one historical development from the field of I/O psychology that you believe has significantly impacted its contemporary practice, including the theories/theorists associated with its historical development.

· Explain how and why this historical development has impacted the contemporary practice of I/O psychology.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et