After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

In your submission, make sure you address the following:

  • Review the PICO(T) process.
  • Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.
  • Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.
  • Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.
  • Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.
  • Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).
  • Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.
  • Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.
  • Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission: Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Attached at the two files to go off of! Please read them carefully! 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

HIPAA Hero: Securing Your Medical Practice Database As a Database Administrator (DBA) for a medical practice, you're a champion for patient privacy!

HIPAA Hero: Securing Your Medical Practice Database As a Database Administrator (DBA) for a medical practice, you're a champion for patient privacy! You've implemented robust safeguards to comply with HIPAA regulations. But cybersecurity is an ongoing battle. Explore three additional practical measures you can take to further enhance your database

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and federal governments and organizations by conducting economic research such as the evaluations of burden of disease, cost effectiveness, and effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat specific diseases.

Using the online resources, identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years) that you believe presents a conflict between public health

Using the online resources, identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years) that you believe presents a conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and current legal statutes (i.e., required vaccinations, no smoking policies, food/restaurant labeling requirements, school nutrition policies, etc.). Then, take the perspective of

Discussion—The Literature Review Process As the community assessment is completed and the statement of the health problem is clearly stated and

Discussion—The Literature Review Process As the community assessment is completed and the statement of the health problem is clearly stated and appropriately quantified using the available epidemiologic tools, one must now start looking at an adequate and suited intervention or policy to address the particular public health problem. The availability