Kindly View Attachment!! Assignment #4 Assessing Subject Matter Content in the Curriculum

Kindly View Attachment!!

Assignment #4

Assessing Subject Matter Content in the Curriculum

(CAEP Unit Assessment #13)

Directions:

Develop a power point presentation for teachers. The presentation will address three ways in which to assess subject matter content in a curriculum. You may choose the grade level. The presentation should last about 20 minutes. (ILA 3.3)

Post your presentation to the discussion board by the end of week 4 to receive input from your colleagues. By the end of week 5, respond to at least two of your colleagues’ presentation and collect their input for your presentation. (ILA 6.3)

Write a one-page paper describing your presentation. Include the rationale and the methods you are using and how you would accommodate diverse students to promote equity for all. Reflect upon the input you receive. Did you agree, and would you change anything in your presentation based upon that feedback?

(ILA 3.4)

Post final presentation and your paper to the assignment drop box by the end of week 6.

Scoring Rubric for Assignment #4:

Element

Not Met

Met

Exceeded

Points

0 – 15

16 – 19

20

Candidates participate in and lead professional learning experiences to assist teachers in selecting, administering, analyzing, interpreting assessments, and using results for instructional dcision making in classrooms and schools (ILA Standard

3.3)

The candidate did not effectively address the rationale, the methods he/she was using, three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom or addressed fewer than three ways of assessment.

The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using, and three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom.

The candidate effectively addressed the rationale, the methods he/she was using and offered more than three ways in which to assess subject matter in the classroom

Points

0 – 7

8 – 9

10

Candidates, using both written and oral communication, explain assessment results and advocate for appropriate literacy and language practices to a variety of stakeholders, including students, administrators, teachers, other educators, and parents/ guardians. (ILA 3.4)

The candidate did not give or receive adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and/or did not write a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators.

The candidate gave and received adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators.

The candidate gave and received comprehensive input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a logical self-reflection., explaining its relevance for educators in detail.

Total Possible Points

30

Points will be deducted for the following:

Late submission

Excessive grammatical, spelling, and/or mechanical errors

Incorrect APA format

Missing title page, page numbers, and/or references

Due: Week 6

Total Value: 30 points Objective 1, 8

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Darr  writes, ” To transform the organization so that its culture is a living  reflection of values that facilitate the mission and vision,

  Darr  writes, ” To transform the organization so that its culture is a living  reflection of values that facilitate the mission and vision, management  must know what values are present in the culture” . Create  a hypothetical organizational philosophy statement. Include a mission  statement, vision statement, and core principles/values. 

 explains the role that learning theories play (or should play) in curriculum development.    Chapter 5: Knowledge and Theories about Curriculum (p.

 explains the role that learning theories play (or should play) in curriculum development.    Chapter 5: Knowledge and Theories about Curriculum (p. 104–128) in: Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Karagiorgi, Y. & Symeou, L. (2005) Translating constructivism into

  analyzes your selected curriculum by explaining which learning theory/theories are at the foundation of your chosen curriculum.  Chapter 5: Knowledge

  analyzes your selected curriculum by explaining which learning theory/theories are at the foundation of your chosen curriculum.  Chapter 5: Knowledge and Theories about Curriculum (p. 104–128) in: Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Karagiorgi, Y. & Symeou, L.

 I need help with my homework. RTI: Progress Monitoring Required Read “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” by Skow and Brown, located

 I need help with my homework. RTI: Progress Monitoring Required Read “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” by Skow and Brown, located on the IRIS Center website, to inform the topic assignment. Page 2: Progress Monitoring Required Read “Page 2: Progress Monitoring,” located on the IRIS Center website. erbilt.edu/module/pmr/cresource/q1/p02/#content Progress Monitoring Required Read

Instructions 1. NELP 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, PSEL 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 3h, 9h Field Experience Hours: 10 Overarching

Instructions 1. NELP 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, PSEL 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 3h, 9h Field Experience Hours: 10 Overarching Question:  How does a principal advocate and model ethical decisions and cultivate professional norms to build a strong learning community committed to the success of every student?  You will complete a portfolio in which examples of how ethical behavior and professional norms