Appendix C Assignment Rubrics Assignment 1 Rubric Instructional Strategies for Critical Thinking Rubric Requirement

Appendix C
Assignment Rubrics

Assignment 1 Rubric
Instructional Strategies for Critical Thinking Rubric

Requirement Exceeds
Expectations

Meets
Expectations

Does Not Meet
Expectations

Strategies Identifies 3
strategies or
activities and
identifies how they
can be used to help
develop critical
thinking/problem
solving skills
4 points

Identifies 2
strategies or
activities and
identifies how they
can be used to help
develop critical
thinking/problem
solving skills
2-3 points

Identifies only
1strategy or activity
and identifies how
they can be used to
help develop critical
thinking/problem
solving skills
0-1 point

Use of
Strategies

Describes in detail
how strategies will
be used, including
the activity(s)
identified that will
utilize each strategy.
Includes how the
strategy will impact
learning.
4 points

Describes the
strategy use in
detail but does not
indicate the
activities that utilize
each strategy.
2-3 points

Does not describe
the activities that
will incorporate
each strategy.
0-1 point

Assessment Indicates how the
strategies will be
assessed to measure
candidate learning,
and uses a graphic
display of data (self-
generated data) to
give a picture of
progress over time.
4 points

Indicates how the
strategies will be
assessed to
measure candidate
learning, but does
not use a graphic
display of data
(self-generated
data) to give a
picture of progress
over time.
2-3 points

Does not indicate
how strategies will
be assessed for
effectiveness.
0-1 point

References Provides 3
professional
references relating
to the strategies
identified
4 points

Provides 2
professional
references relating
to the strategies
identified
2-3 points

Provides only 1
professional
reference relating to
the strategies
identified
0-1 point

Generated: 4/8/2025 Page 14 of 16

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  analyzes your selected curriculum by explaining which learning theory/theories are at the foundation of your chosen curriculum.  Chapter 5: Knowledge

  analyzes your selected curriculum by explaining which learning theory/theories are at the foundation of your chosen curriculum.  Chapter 5: Knowledge and Theories about Curriculum (p. 104–128) in: Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Karagiorgi, Y. & Symeou, L.

 I need help with my homework. RTI: Progress Monitoring Required Read “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” by Skow and Brown, located

 I need help with my homework. RTI: Progress Monitoring Required Read “RTI: Progress Monitoring,” by Skow and Brown, located on the IRIS Center website, to inform the topic assignment. Page 2: Progress Monitoring Required Read “Page 2: Progress Monitoring,” located on the IRIS Center website. erbilt.edu/module/pmr/cresource/q1/p02/#content Progress Monitoring Required Read

Instructions 1. NELP 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, PSEL 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 3h, 9h Field Experience Hours: 10 Overarching

Instructions 1. NELP 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, PSEL 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 3h, 9h Field Experience Hours: 10 Overarching Question:  How does a principal advocate and model ethical decisions and cultivate professional norms to build a strong learning community committed to the success of every student?  You will complete a portfolio in which examples of how ethical behavior and professional norms

Student Achievement Chart (SAC) Standard(s): Content: 7.RP.3 – Use proportional relationships to solve multistep ratio and percent

Student Achievement Chart (SAC) Standard(s): Content: 7.RP.3 – Use proportional relationships to solve multistep ratio and percent problems. Examples: simple interest, tax, markups, and markdowns, gratuities and commissions, fees, percent increase and decrease, and percent error. Literacy (6-12): Craft & Structure – Interpret words and phrases as they are used

2 Discussion 4 Name Institution Course Instructor Date

2 Discussion 4 Name Institution Course Instructor Date Discussion 4 Part 1 The article titled “AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community” written by Elali and Rachid in 2023 is addressing the impact of AI-generated research fabrication where it is focusing on its power of running from