Discussion 3.5 Face the Future  Instructions: Step 1: Read the Scenario The Scenario:A major U.S. city is expanding the use of facial recognition

Discussion 3.5 Face the Future 

Instructions:

Step 1: Read the Scenario

The Scenario:A major U.S. city is expanding the use of facial recognition software in its criminal justice system. The software is used to identify suspects in surveillance footage, monitor protests, and track people at airports and public events.

Proponents argue it makes policing more efficient and modern.Critics argue it misidentifies people of color and violates privacy.

The city is taking public feedback before voting on full implementation.

Step 2: Choose a Stakeholder Role

Choose ONE of the following stakeholder perspectives for your initial post:

  1. Police Leadership – You want this tool to fight crime and improve public safety.
  2. Civil Rights Advocate – You’re concerned about racial bias and surveillance.
  3. Tech Developer – You believe the tech can improve with the right oversight.
  4. Marginalized Community Member – You’ve experienced over-policing and mistrust of surveillance.

Step 3: Write Your Initial Post  

Respond to the following prompts:

  • From your chosen perspective, do you support or oppose the expansion of facial recognition? Why?
  • How does this relate to modernization theory (progress, tech, institutional change)?
  • What reforms or safeguards would your group want?

 Initial posts are due by Thursday, 11:59 pm 

Suggested word count: 250 -300 words

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

The article “Dumbing Down Juries” raises concerns about how attorneys often remove jurors with specialized knowledge or professional expertise during

The article “Dumbing Down Juries” raises concerns about how attorneys often remove jurors with specialized knowledge or professional expertise during jury selection—favoring those perceived as more easily influenced. While this strategy may serve legal tactics, it raises important questions about fairness, competence, and transparency in the judicial process. In the

Scruples” Assignment Students shall personally write and upload “A Question of Scruples” (“Scruples”) question by the deadline noted at the end of the

Scruples” Assignment Students shall personally write and upload “A Question of Scruples” (“Scruples”) question by the deadline noted at the end of the syllabus. The “Scruples” question should present a short moral or ethical dilemma. Following the question (the “Scruples card”), the student should then describe why the question is in fact a