Week 4 Discussion: Continue Your DiscussionApplying an Anti-Racism Lens when Conducting Research Your discussion this week focuses on foundational

Week 4 Discussion: Continue Your DiscussionApplying an Anti-Racism Lens when Conducting Research

Your discussion this week focuses on foundational considerations for conducting social work research. As you have learned in this week’s content, research can have a tremendous impact at all levels of social work practice. The power of research, then, must be harnessed in an ethical manner to ensure equity for all. In your discussion, consider what this may mean for you as you conduct research. Here are a few ideas to get you started:

  • The Toolkit for Centering Racial Equity addresses intersectionality. How do you think intersectionality applies to your life or the life of someone you know? (If you share about someone else, please protect their privacy by using a pseudonym and being careful not to share identifying information. For instance, if I identify a relative or close friend, even if I use a pseudonym, others may be able to figure out who I am referring to.)
  • As you consider the content of research that describes people (Chapter 5) through an anti-racism lens, what practices (other than the collection of gender data) did you find that you would consider problematic? How might you address this in data collection?
  • Share a short video or other resource about Participatory Action Research. What are three key points you would share with others?
  • How might you apply this week’s course content toward your work, your upcoming assignment, or to your life in general?

Response Guidelines

  • Your Writing: Each post should show courtesy, be succinct, professional, well written and organized, using proper writing mechanics, grammar, and punctuation.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and

Public health economists are at the forefront in optimizing limited resources to advance health outcomes. They offer assistance to local, state, and federal governments and organizations by conducting economic research such as the evaluations of burden of disease, cost effectiveness, and effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat specific diseases.

Using the online resources, identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years) that you believe presents a conflict between public health

Using the online resources, identify and analyze a case of your choice (no older than 8 years) that you believe presents a conflict between public health, healthcare ethics, and current legal statutes (i.e., required vaccinations, no smoking policies, food/restaurant labeling requirements, school nutrition policies, etc.). Then, take the perspective of

Discussion—The Literature Review Process As the community assessment is completed and the statement of the health problem is clearly stated and

Discussion—The Literature Review Process As the community assessment is completed and the statement of the health problem is clearly stated and appropriately quantified using the available epidemiologic tools, one must now start looking at an adequate and suited intervention or policy to address the particular public health problem. The availability

Discussion—Difference between Evidence-based Public Health and Evidence-based Medicine The concept of evidence-based practice is well established in

Discussion—Difference between Evidence-based Public Health and Evidence-based Medicine The concept of evidence-based practice is well established in numerous disciplines including psychology, social work, nursing, medicine, and public health. The concept, however, is probably more established in medicine compared to any other disciplines. There are important distinctions between evidence-based approaches in