Assess Your Own Personality: Coping Flexibility Scale (week 2 folder) Assess Your Own Personality: Identity versus Identity Diffusion Scale (week 2

Assess Your Own Personality: Coping Flexibility Scale (week 2 folder)

Assess Your Own Personality: Identity versus Identity Diffusion Scale (week 2 folder)

Assess Your Own Personality: Index of Self-Actualization (week 4 folder)

Assess Your Own Personality: Impression Management Scale (week 4 folder)

After completing the assessments answer the questions below. 

Let’s Discuss! 

Answer the discussion questions below in a minimum of 100 words.

Please respond to two of your peer’s posts with a minimum of 25 words.  

DO NOT NEED TO SHARE YOUR ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS, just your experience completing it.

  1. What were your thoughts while completing the assessments?
  2. Do you feel the questions were too evasive?
  3. What is something you could do to create an environment where a client would feel safe answering these questions?
  4. Any questions you did not like?
  5. Using APA 7th edition, research and cite one reason someone would use these SPECIFIC personality test.

(For example, sometimes personality tests are used for employers to find a good match while in the hiring process) 

Hint: This is a helpful APA website 

Double Hint: Google what the assessments are for and then research something that supports that statement and cite it. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading Rubric:                                                                         Poor                                  Excellent Possible Introduction                                                   13.75   16.25   18.75   21.25   23.75   25 Start w/problem statement – why do this?  And lead into a theory – why do we predict the  variables to be related? Theories explain why Review

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S.

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S. (2023). Different types of laughter and their function foremotion regulation in dyadic interactions. Current Psychology: A Journal for DiversePerspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(28), 24249–24259. 2. Cai,

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitivedevelopment. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects ofinformation-processing theories