HRM411 – Seminar in Human Resource Management Journal: Reflection Due Date: 11:59 pm EST, Friday of Unit 8 Points: 100 Overview: As HR

HRM411 – Seminar in Human
Resource Management

Journal: Reflection

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST, Friday of Unit 8
Points: 100

Overview:

As HR professionals grapple with the ‘changes’ and revisions’ to their work, it becomes
imperative to develop and implement new performance measures to ensure that HR
moves forward to be a strategic business partner, thus driving competitive advantage.

Instructions:

Describe what parameters will be needed to measure performance for HR professionals
over the next five years.

Requirements:

• Submit a Word document in APA format.
• Maximum three pages, minimum 500 words in length, excluding the Title and

Reference pages.
• At least two resources.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Reflection Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0 – 38 points 39 – 51 points 52 – 64 points 65 points
Content Does not cover

the assigned
topic;
assertions are
not supported
by evidence;
paper is
seriously
lacking in
content and
detail.

Does not do an
adequate job of
covering the
assigned topic;
assertions are
weakly
supported by
evidence.

Sufficient
coverage of the
topics; most
assertions are
supported by
evidence.

Provides in-
depth coverage
of the topics,
assertions are
clearly
supported by
evidence.

0 – 5 points 6 – 7 points 8 – 9 points 10 points
Resources 0 resources or

resources that
were not
relevant

n/a 1 relevant
resource

2 relevant
resources

Paper Length Does not meet
the length
requirement.

n/a n/a Meets the
length
requirement.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Clear and
Professional
Writing and
APA Format

Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.

Significant
errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.

Few errors that
do not impede
professional
presentation.

Writing and
format are
clear,
professional,
APA compliant,
and error free.

  • Overview:
  • Instructions:
  • Requirements:
  • Evaluation Rubric for Journal: Reflection Assignment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning and staffing deficiencies. The CEO has decided to hire a consulting firm to evaluate its current processes and make recommendations for improvement. Upon initial review, the consulting firm has determined that

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions below. SCENARIO: Your company, a growing firm in the financial services industry, is extremely sensitive to the issues surrounding business ethics. The company wants to be proactive in developing a

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Week 1 Discussion Post Take the survey,  Test your Cultural Intelligence . While

Week 1 Discussion Post Take the survey,  Test your Cultural Intelligence . While this survey offers interesting insights, it doesn’t adhere to scientific rigor. Use its findings accordingly. Explain if you think the results accurately describe you and why. Consider sharing your experiences that may have played into the results.