see attached Wk 3 Team – Prosecution and Defense Arguments In this assignment, you will be introduced to what is required to defend and

see attached

Wk 3 Team – Prosecution and Defense Arguments

In this assignment, you will be introduced to what is required to defend and prosecute a
case. Your team will present the prosecution and defense arguments for a case. Work
together in your group to come to a consensus for your side. Take this opportunity to
imagine yourself in the place of the defense or prosecution.

You continue to excel as the newest paralegal in your law firm. Your next task is to organize
a modified mock trial to assist the lawyers in preparing for the pending trial.

Separate the team into 2 groups. One group will represent the defense and the other group
will represent the prosecution.

Review the State v. Stu Dents Court Case document to develop your arguments.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that includes each side’s arguments.

Defense group, address the following as you write your arguments:

• Define types of homicide and corpus delicti. How is this related to the case?

• Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not?

• Distinguish between competency to stand trial and an insanity defense.

• What is required in your state for an insanity defense?

• What steps must be taken to prove insanity?

Prosecution group, address the following as you write your arguments:

• List the elements of each crime and the facts that establish each element.

• Provide a specific state law for each charge and identify the state where that law is
effective. Each group member’s state needs to be represented.

• Include the state where your case would be the strongest.

Format the paper according to APA guidelines.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable

1. criminal justice and criminology research, ensuring the validity of experimental findings is crucial for producing reliable and generalizable results. Internal validity refers to the extent to which a study can demonstrate a causal relationship between variables, while external validity pertains to the generalizability of the findings to broader populations

1. The question of whether Administrative Law Judges should be appointed for life, similar to U.S. District Court judges, involves balancing

1. The question of whether Administrative Law Judges should be appointed for life, similar to U.S. District Court judges, involves balancing judicial independence, accountability, expertise, and flexibility in government administration. ALJs play a crucial role in adjudicating disputes involving federal agencies, and their decisions can significantly impact regulatory enforcement and

100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Epps The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable

100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Epps The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy shape law enforcement procedures and criminal investigations. These principles define the boundaries of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, ensuring a balance between security and individual rights (Carpenter