C200 managing organizations and leading people *****THE ORGANIZTION CAN EITHER BE BURGER KING OR THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS***** For this task, you

C200 managing organizations and leading people

*****THE ORGANIZTION CAN EITHER BE BURGER KING OR THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS*****

For this task, you will write a paper on an existing organization with which you have had personal experience. The organization can be a business or a nonprofit, and you may represent any level of the organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) in your analysis.You will first describe the chosen organization. Your description of the organization should convey personal experience, rather than information gained from secondhand sources or media coverage. You will then perform a SWOT analysis on that organization. Last, you will analyze that organization’s leadership.Note: Any information that would be considered confidential, proprietary, or personal in nature should not be included in the actual task submission to WGU. Do not include the actual names of people, suppliers, the organization(s), or other identifiable information. Fictional names should be used. Also, organization-specific data, including financial information, should not be included but should be addressed in a general fashion as appropriate. Work performed for clients and employers is their property and should not be used without written permission.

Requirements

Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information.  Grammarly Note: Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information.  Microsoft Files Note: Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc.  All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements.   

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Write a paper (suggested length of 10–16 pages) by doing the following:

A.  Describe an existing organization with which you have had personal experience and its objective(s).

1.  Describe three leadership practices of the current leader, other than yourself, in the existing organization.

 Note: Leadership practices are routine actions, behaviors, functions, and responsibilities that the current leader performs.

2.  Discuss how the current leader has affected organizational culture.

 Note: You may represent any level of the chosen organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) and the respective current leader in your description.

B.  Conduct a SWOT analysis evaluating the chosen organization by doing the following:

1.  Evaluate two of the organization’s current strengths.

2.  Evaluate two of the organization’s current weaknesses.

3.  Evaluate two of the organization’s current unmet opportunities.

4.  Evaluate two of the organization’s current unresolved threats.

Note: The accepted model for a SWOT analysis defines strengths and weaknesses as internal to the organization, and opportunities and threats as external to the organization. 

C.  Conduct a leadership evaluation of the current leader discussed in part A1, using one of the scholarly leadership theories below that is different from task 1, by doing the following:

•   transformational leadership

•   transactional leadership

•   situational leadership

•   participative leadership

•   servant leadership

•   behavioral leadership

•   trait theory of leadership

1.  Evaluate three strengths of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each strength relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s strengths with at least one scholarly source.

2.  Evaluate three weaknesses of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each weakness relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s weaknesses with at least one scholarly source.

3.  Recommend three actionable items to improve the effectiveness of the current leader, including how each actionable item relates to the chosen scholarly leadership theory. Support the recommendations of actionable items with at least one scholarly source.

Note: The recommendations need to address the current leaders identified leadership weakness.

Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, or any source from a university faculty member or business leader. Scholarly sources also include any article or book in the online WGU library.

D.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

E.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Unit 2 DB: Knowing your

Unit 2 DB: Knowing your audience  Knowing your audience is vital for successful emergency communications. Give an example of the potential impact(s) of not using this strategy. Your example should be based on either a notional (theoretical) or actual emergency event.

 DB: Emergency Support

 DB: Emergency Support Functions From the Unit 2 readings and resources, you know there are 15 Emergency Support Functions (ESFs) in the National Response Framework (NRF).  Choose an ESF that interests you. Assume the role of a Public Affairs representative at a town meeting. Your job will be to explain

Restaurant Observation ActivityObjectives The objective of this individual activity is for students to practice how to properly observe a restaurant’s

Restaurant Observation ActivityObjectives The objective of this individual activity is for students to practice how to properly observe a restaurant’s service, flow, cleanliness, leadership, employees, and the restaurant building and facility.  Guidelines Choose a restaurant you would like to observe and follow the guidelines and grading rubric below. Guidelines and

Professional

Professional Memo Overview:  Write a professional memo. Instructions:  1. Choose an emergency management or homeland security agency and assume the role of an employee in the Public Information Unit.  2. Following the Purdue OWL memo guidelines in Unit 1, write a memo to your supervisor, John Smith, asking to attend

Part II: Interoperable Communications  Overview:  For this assignment, you will assume the role of the Logistics Section Chief (LSC) for the JPB Northern

Part II: Interoperable Communications  Overview:  For this assignment, you will assume the role of the Logistics Section Chief (LSC) for the JPB Northern Railroad Train Derailment scenario. Refer to the attached Incident Radio Communications Plan, ICS-205 form. Research and report on currently available Interoperable Communications technology. In the role of