Assessment Description For this topic’s assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that discusses your cultural background and your own

Assessment Description

For this topic’s assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that discusses your cultural background and your own related experiences. In addition, you will record yourself delivering the presentation using the speaker notes that you will include in your PowerPoint. When discussing your culture, consider components of yourself such as race, ethnicity, religion, spiritual heritage, gender, sexual orientation, disabilities, socioeconomic status, traditions, and family heritage. You are not required to include any information you do not feel comfortable sharing. 

Assignment Requirements: 

  • A 9-10-slide PowerPoint including a title slide and reference slide (title and reference slides are not included in slide count). 
  • Detailed speaker notes a minimum of 100 words on each content-related slide that represent what would be said if you were giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. 
  • A 9–10-minute video using your GCU licensed Zoom account to record yourself giving the presentation with both your camera and microphone on. The instructor will need a Zoom link placed in the speaker notes of the title slide of the PowerPoint. Refer to the “GCU Zoom Resources: Counseling and Social Work” in Class Resources. 
  • Three to five scholarly resources supporting your cultural views. Refer to the dispositional values for your respective programs in the Class Resources. 
  • Appropriate APA based in-text citations and references. 

PowerPoint Requirements:

Include the following in your presentation, note the required number of slides for each bullet point: 

  • Communication styles of your culture (verbal and nonverbal) (1-2 slides) 
  • Aspects of your culture you are proud of (1 slide) 
  • Aspects of your culture that you would like to improve upon (1-2 slides) 
  • Stereotypes toward your culture (1 slide) 
  • Stereotypes held within your culture (1 slide) 
  • How your culture perceives substance use. Are there any traditional uses of substances that are deemed culturally acceptable? (1 slide) 
  • How your culture perceives counseling (1 slide) 
  • How your cultural background will influence your ability to counsel someone from within your culture Refer to the dispositional values for your respective programs in the Class Resources. (1 slide) 
  • How your cultural background will influence your ability to counsel someone from another culture. Refer to the dispositional values for your respective programs in the Class Resources. (1 slide) 

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

This assignment is informed by the following CACREP Standards:2.F.2.a. Multicultural and pluralistic characteristics within and among diverse groups nationally and internationally.2.F.2.b. Theories and models of multicultural counseling, cultural identity development, and social justice and advocacy.2.F.2.c. Multicultural counseling competencies.2.F.2.d. The impact of heritage, attitudes, beliefs, understandings, and acculturative experiences on an individual’s views of others.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading Rubric:                                                                         Poor                                  Excellent Possible Introduction                                                   13.75   16.25   18.75   21.25   23.75   25 Start w/problem statement – why do this?  And lead into a theory – why do we predict the  variables to be related? Theories explain why Review

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S.

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S. (2023). Different types of laughter and their function foremotion regulation in dyadic interactions. Current Psychology: A Journal for DiversePerspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(28), 24249–24259. 2. Cai,

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitivedevelopment. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects ofinformation-processing theories