Description

Description

I want the answer without similarity at all, and Conceptual and professional, they’re important. I have a solution model.

‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬
‫وزارة التعليم‬
‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University

College of Administrative and Financial Sciences

Assignment 1
Decision Making and Problem Solving (MGT 312)
Due Date: End of week 6, 1/03/2024 @ 23:59
Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Student’s Name:
Solving
Course Code: MGT312
Student’s ID Number:
Semester: 2ND

CRN: 27260
Academic Year:2024-25; SECOND SEMESTER

For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name: Karim Garrouch
Students’ Grade:
/ 10

Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low

General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY

The Assignment must be submitted only in WORD format via allocated folder.

Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.

Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be
reduced for poor presentation.

Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.

Late submission will NOT be accepted.

Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or
other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.

All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font.
No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.

Restricted – ‫مقيد‬

Course Learning Outcomes-Covered

Demonstrate a solid understanding of decision making process for complex issues
pertaining to business environment both internally and externally. (1.2)

Explain critical thinking and cognitive psychology as it pertains to analyze and
synthesize information for problem solving and decision making. (2.7)

Identify and analyze different perspectives on understanding problems for different
situations. (3.1)

Assignment Instructions:
• Log in to Saudi Digital Library (SDL) via University’s website
• On first page of SDL, choose “English Databases”
• From the list find and click on EBSCO database.
• In the search bar of EBSCO find the following article:
Title:
“To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It”
Author:
Julia Binder and Michael D. Watkins
Date of Publication:
January February 2024
Published:
Harvard Business Review

Assignment Questions:

(Marks 10)

Read the attached article titled as “To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It” by Julia
Binder and Michael D. Watkins, published in Harvard Business Review, and answer
the following Questions:
1. Summarize the article and explain the main issues discussed in the article. (In
500-600 words) [4 Marks]
2. What do you think about the article in relations to what you have learnt in the
course about problem solving approach and improving decision making skills?
Use additional reference to support your argument. (In 150-200 words) [2 Marks]
Critical Thinking Question:
3. How would you handle a situation where a colleague is having trouble
understanding your process or solution? (In 100-150 words) [2 Marks]
4. How would you handle a situation where you noticed your supervisor made an error
in a report or presentation? (In 100-150 words) [2 Marks]

Restricted – ‫مقيد‬

Answer

Restricted – ‫مقيد‬

‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬
‫وزارة التعليم‬
‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University

College of Administrative and Financial Sciences

Assignment 1
Decision Making and Problem Solving (MGT 312)
Due Date: End of week 6, 1/03/2024 @ 23:59
Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Student’s Name: SEU ELITE
Solving
Course Code: MGT312
Student’s ID Number:
Semester: 2ND

CRN: 27262
Academic Year:2024-25; SECOND SEMESTER

For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade:
/ 10

Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low

General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY

The Assignment must be submitted only in WORD format via allocated folder.

Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.

Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be
reduced for poor presentation.

Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.

Late submission will NOT be accepted.

Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or
other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.

All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font.
No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.

Course Learning Outcomes-Covered

Demonstrate a solid understanding of decision making process for complex issues
pertaining to business environment both internally and externally. (1.2)

Explain critical thinking and cognitive psychology as it pertains to analyze and
synthesize information for problem solving and decision making. (2.7)

Identify and analyze different perspectives on understanding problems for different
situations. (3.1)

Assignment Instructions:
• Log in to Saudi Digital Library (SDL) via University’s website
• On first page of SDL, choose “English Databases”
• From the list find and click on EBSCO database.
• In the search bar of EBSCO find the following article:
Title:
“To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It”
Author:
Julia Binder and Michael D. Watkins
Date of Publication:
January February 2024
Published:
Harvard Business Review

Assignment Questions:

(Marks 10)

Read the attached article titled as “To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It” by Julia
Binder and Michael D. Watkins, published in Harvard Business Review, and answer
the following Questions:
1. Summarize the article and explain the main issues discussed in the article. (In
500-600 words) [4 Marks]
2. What do you think about the article in relations to what you have learnt in the
course about problem solving approach and improving decision making skills?
Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 150-200 words) [2 Marks]
Critical Thinking Question:
3. How would you handle a situation where a colleague is having trouble
understanding your process or solution? (In 100-150 words) [2 Marks]
4. How would you handle a situation where you noticed your supervisor made an error
in a report or presentation? (In 100-150 words) [2 Marks]

Answers

Q1. In the article “To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It,” authors Julia Binder and
Michael D. Watkins emphasize the importance of problem-framing in effective decisionmaking and problem-solving within organizations. They argue that many companies rush
into finding solutions without adequately understanding the underlying issues. This hasty
approach often leads to suboptimal outcomes and missed opportunities for innovation.
The authors outline a structured methodology, the E5 framework, which consists of five
phases: Expand, Examine, Empathize, Elevate, and Envision. This framework aims to
ensure a comprehensive understanding of complex problems before attempting to solve
them.
The article begins by highlighting a common pitfall in organizational decision-making:
the tendency to jump straight into solution mode. The authors reference research
indicating that a significant number of decision-making processes fail due to insufficient
problem examination. For instance, Paul Nutt’s study revealed that more than half of the
analyzed decision-making cases in medium to large companies did not achieve their
desired results, primarily due to the pressure to act quickly. This lack of thorough
analysis restricts teams’ abilities to design innovative solutions.
To counter this issue, Binder and Watkins propose a five-phase approach to problemframing. The first phase, Expand, encourages teams to set aside preconceived notions
and explore the problem comprehensively. They introduce a tool called frame-storming,
which focuses on identifying all aspects of a challenge rather than generating solutions
for a pre-defined problem. This phase fosters creativity and helps teams uncover
assumptions and blind spots.
The second phase, Examine, involves digging deeper to identify root causes. The
authors suggest using the iceberg model, which distinguishes between surface-level
events and deeper systemic factors contributing to a problem. By exploring these layers,
teams can better understand the complexities of the issue at hand and avoid superficial
solutions.

In the third phase, Empathize, the focus shifts to understanding the perspectives of
stakeholders affected by the problem. The authors advocate for the creation of empathy
maps to capture what different stakeholders think, feel, say, and do regarding the issue.
This process ensures that the solutions developed are aligned with the needs and
perceptions of those impacted.
The fourth phase, Elevate, requires teams to consider broader organizational issues and
how these connect to the problem. The authors recommend employing the four-frame
model by Bolman and Deal, which examines structural, human resources, political, and
symbolic aspects of the organization. This holistic view allows teams to identify
interconnected issues and understand the broader context influencing the problem.
Finally, in the Envision phase, teams transition from analysis to action by setting clear
goals and backcasting to outline a path toward achieving these objectives. This involves
defining long-term milestones and immediate actions necessary for success. By
synthesizing insights from the previous phases, teams can create a strategic action plan
that directs efforts toward a concrete outcome.
Throughout the article, the authors illustrate their points with a case study of a fictional
company, Omega Soundscapes, which faced declining sales. By applying the E5
framework, Omega’s leadership team was able to uncover deeper issues related to
product quality, market perception, and sales team morale. This structured approach led
to the development of a comprehensive action plan aimed at revitalizing the brand and
addressing customer concerns.
“To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It” advocates for a deliberate and structured
approach to problem-solving that goes beyond superficial solutions. The E5 framework
serves as a valuable tool for organizations seeking to enhance their decision-making
processes and foster innovation. By taking the time to thoroughly understand the
complexities of a problem, teams can design more effective and sustainable solutions.

Q2. The article aligns closely with the principles regarding structured problem-solving
and decision-making. The E5 framework—Expand, Examine, Empathize, Elevate, and

Envision—highlights the necessity of thoroughly understanding a problem before
jumping to solutions, which is a critical skill emphasized in.
Effective decision-making requires examining problems from multiple perspectives, as
supported by research from Simon (1977) on bounded rationality, which suggests that
decision-makers often operate under constraints that limit their ability to consider all
options. By employing tools like frame-storming and the iceberg model, organizations
can uncover underlying issues and stakeholder perspectives, fostering innovative
solutions.
Furthermore, the emphasis on empathy in the decision-making process resonates with
Goleman’s (1998) work on emotional intelligence, which underscores the importance of
understanding others’ emotions and motivations in leadership. Overall, the article
reinforces the notion that a comprehensive approach to problem-solving not only
improves decision-making skills but also enhances organizational effectiveness.

Q3. When a colleague struggles to understand my process or solution, I would first
approach the situation with empathy and open communication. I would initiate a private
conversation to identify their specific concerns or confusion. By actively listening, I can
gauge their understanding and clarify any misconceptions. Visual aids, such as flowcharts
or diagrams, can help illustrate complex ideas more effectively (Larkin & Simon, 1987).
Furthermore, I would encourage collaborative discussion, inviting them to share their
thoughts and perspectives, which can foster a deeper understanding. If necessary, I would
offer to walk them through the process step-by-step, ensuring they feel supported
throughout. This approach not only enhances clarity but also strengthens our professional
relationship.

Q4. If I noticed an error in a report or presentation made by my supervisor, I would
handle the situation with tact and professionalism. First, I would verify the error to ensure
that my observation is accurate. Then, I would approach my supervisor privately, framing
the conversation positively, focusing on the goal of maintaining high-quality work. I
might say something like, “I noticed a detail in the report that might need a second look.”
This approach minimizes defensiveness and fosters a collaborative atmosphere (Brown et
al., 1996). If my supervisor is receptive, I would offer to assist in correcting the error.
Maintaining respect and professionalism is crucial, as it helps preserve the working
relationship while ensuring that the final product is accurate.

References
Binder, J., & Watkins, M. D. (2024). To solve a tough problem, reframe it. Harvard
Business Review, January–February, 80-89.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
Simon, H. A. (1977). The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice Hall.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand
words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-99.
Brown, D. J., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (1996). Ethical leadership: A review and
future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 255-279.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Description

Description SEE College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Course name: Applied Biostatistics Course number: PHC321 CRN: 22884 Paper Assignment-1 Answer the following questions in a Word document using the provided datasheet (you may use SPSS or MS Excel for your analysis). The datasheet contains national

Description

Description Chapter 1: Description of the company This section should answer the following questions: What is the full title of the company/institution? Give a brief history of the company, full mailing address and relevant weblinks What is the type of ownership of the company/institution? State the main shareholders and their

Description

Description Revise the word file according to the instructor’s comments, and after making the necessary changes, organize it based on the requirements outlined in the attached PDF. Due 8th May 2025 by 11:59 pm. Research Methods and Quantitative Analysis 2nd Semester, 2025 EMBA – Section JA The proposal is worth

Description

Description see ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Course name: Health and Environmental Risk Assessment Course number: PHC 351 CRN: Assignment title or task: (You can write a question) Discuss the steps and methods of risk communication and community engagement and support your answer with examples. Student name: xxxx Student ID: xxxx Submission

Description

Description see College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health PAPER ASSIGNMENT Course name: Introduction to Mental Health Course number: PHC-273 Go through the research articles in the link below and answer any one of the following questions in at least 350 words. • • Assignment task Q1. Discuss about

Description

Description HALAH JAMALULDINE Module 14 Collapse Change management is a critical process in healthcare organizations, particularly in Saudi Arabia, where the healthcare system is undergoing rapid transformation to align with Vision 2030. One notable change in a Saudi healthcare organization was the implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in a

Description

Description Module 14: Rewarding through Performance Management Effective Reward Systems in Performance Management Performance management systems and reward systems are essential components of motivating and driving individual and group performance in organizations. Analyze reward systems and the appropriate application to meet organizational goals. Discuss the different types of reward systems,

Description

Description Reply to discussion (Module 14: Rewarding through Performance Management) Q – Please read the discussion Attached and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments that further and advance the discussion topic. The reply needs to be substantial and constructive in nature. it should add to the content

Description

Description Reply to discussion (Module 14: Rewarding through Performance Management) Q – Please read the discussion Attached and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments that further and advance the discussion topic. The reply needs to be substantial and constructive in nature. it should add to the content

Description

Description Author(s) Year Study Name Study Type Amponin & Britiller 2023 Electronic health records (EHRs): effectiveness to health care outcomes and challenges of health practitioners in Saudi Arabia empirical, descriptive, and cross-sectional study Alfaleh et al. 2022 The role of telemedicine services in changing users’ intentions for presenting to the

Description

Description Hello, the task is to write a discussion and Quiz for module 14 from MKT640 course

Description

Description I want assistance with my internship report. will give details later 👍🏼 You may use AI to save time, as long as it gives accurate description, I don’t mind it =) College of Administration and Finance Sciences Form No 4- Internship Report Cover Page Student`s name: Student`s ID #:

Description

Description See College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health HCM101-PAPER ASSIGNMENT Course name: Healthcare Management Course number: HCM101 CRN The textbook (Buchbinder & Shanks (2012), second edition, chapter 5) addresses an essential topic in health care, which is strategic planning. SWOT analysis is a significant tool that healthcare leaders

Description

Description Consumer Behavior Case Study: Nike and Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Introduction Nike is a global leader in athletic apparel and footwear. Its success can be partly explained by how it meets different levels of consumer needs based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, which include: 1.Physiological, 2.Safety, 3.Social, 4.Esteem, and

Description

Description Dis. one file. Discuss in detail the process that a researcher hypothetically would go through when they become aware of a population health problem that arises during the Hajj. What research would be needed to protect the population of the Kingdom? reply. Hi Sarah, Great discussion! I agree that

Description

Description The organizational behavior aspects (motivation – attuited – personality – emotion ..etc. ) helps the manger to understand their employees in the work environment In two essays answer the following questions: 1.How those aspects will be effect in the work performance and employee satisfaction? (5 grades) 2.What are some

Description

Description see College of Computing and Informatics Assignment 2 Deadline: Sunday 13/04/2025 @ 23:59 [Total Mark for this Assignment is 8] Student Details: Name: ### ID: ### CRN: ### Instructions: • You must submit two separate copies (one Word file and one PDF file) using the Assignment Template on Blackboard

Description

Description I need help completing a discussion board post for my Management course (Managing Perform. for Results). Below are the exact requirements provided by my instructor: Description: In this module, you will examine how pay and reward structures support and facilitate performance management. You will also compare traditional and contingent