SHEILA- UP TO 3/2/2025- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 3 PARTS /

SHEILA- UP TO 3/2/2025-

***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED*****

****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 3 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED******

PART 1- Module 7 – DISCUSSION 7

Philosophy for Your Posterity

If you had to give your own philosophy on life, what would it be? In other words, what would be your wise words to pass along to the next generation? Then ask one of your classmates a question about their response. 

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:

  • The essay is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, misspellings, and incorrect APA format.
  • Your essay should be a minimum of 200 words in length, using 2 ACADEMIC SOURCES, APA FORMAT, excluding the title and references page.

PART 2- Module 7 – ASSIGNMENT 7

Use Philosophy to Create a Law Code for Technology

Part I: Choosing from the Philosophers in the chapter, comprise a rationale that warrants the use of one of their ideas to the current state of technology. Make your argument in the form EITHER (NOT BOTH) a 3-page paper describing your position.

Hélène Cixous: A French feminist writer, poet, and philosopher known for her work on feminist theory and literary criticism.

Part II: Synthesize your ideas into a law code that would be used by a government to police their general use of technology.

Submission Instructions:

·       The submission is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

·       The submission should be formatted per current APA and 3 PAGES in length. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles within your work.

PART 3- Module 2- DISCUSSION 2

Your Favorite Philosopher

Compose a 500–word essay that explains the philosophical reasons for choosing your favorite philosopher. In other words, provide a philosophical defense for your philosopher’s ideas, along with an explanation of how the Philosopher’s ideas relate to why you favor them. What may help is for you to examine how your own values and beliefs influence your choice.

Note:  If you choose the same philosopher from a previous discussion, be sure to avoid plagiarism by providing new, updated, justifications in your response.

Submission Instructions:

Your essay should be a minimum of 500 words in length, using 2 ACADEMIC SOURCES, APA FORMAT, excluding the title and references page.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Considering Development & Professional Youth Development to Identify Program Targets (Tue 10/22) Submit a brief paper that addresses key developmental

Considering Development & Professional Youth Development to Identify Program Targets (Tue 10/22) Submit a brief paper that addresses key developmental and/or PYD practice research and theory to identify and justify the type of program and youth outcomes you’ll target. We should see the logical connection between developmental research/theory PYD frameworks/practices

Leadership Problem Analysis & Solutions 1. Through a short video (or face to face oral presentation), share your leadership knowledge through analysis of a

Leadership Problem Analysis & Solutions 1. Through a short video (or face to face oral presentation), share your leadership knowledge through analysis of a leadership challenge that you have faced. Develop, evaluate and critique alternative solutions which allow you to demonstrate the communication skills, critical thinking skills, and leadership theories

Journal 13: There is a maximum of 1500 characters. 1.      Discuss what you mean by family values. 2.      Distinguish between the public and private

Journal 13: There is a maximum of 1500 characters. 1.      Discuss what you mean by family values. 2.      Distinguish between the public and private aspects of human sexuality. Do you think that this distinction is important when examining morality, marriage and human sexuality? Explain your reasoning. 3.      Discuss the advantages