Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text, no web-sites, blogs, commentary, abstracts, or opinion pieces ) on 

Review a professional resource ( peer-reviewed journal or text, no web-sites, blogs, commentary, abstracts, or opinion pieces ) on 
Spirituality in counseling following a Disaster.

The review must provide the following (hummm…these look like headings in a paper to me; hint, hint):

1. Source reference in APA 7th reference style,
1b.  Citations as necessary (this is only an issue if you reference other’s article information in your summary, otherwise it is assumed that the summary is strictly dealing with the single article / text referenced).

2. Summarize the article well,

3. Note strengths and weaknesses of the article,

4. and the Benefit / Negative (pro/con) to the student as a counseling professional.

There is no page limit. Cover all of the required points well / thoroughly and all will go well. I prefer if you can do so with efficiency and brevity, perhaps even eloquence. But I have no minimum or maximum limit of pages (that is an archaic structure that limits self-expression).

Upload a document of your summary in .doc or .docx format

As we are using TurnItIn to combat AI and plagiarism, you are recommended to turn in your paper early, return to the assignment after TurnItIn has reviewed your submission, and then use the TurnItin analysis to improve your paper.

REFER TO PDF FOR PEER REVIEW ARTICLE

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et