Part A CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter’s Forum After reviewing the Hooter’s video please provide 1) your thoughts an

Part A

CHP3A) BFOQ Hooter’s Forum

After reviewing the Hooter’s video please provide 1) your thoughts and opinions on the video, and 2) comment of the video being sure to include how the content in this video relates to chapter 3’s concept of BFOQ (see p. 92).

 

 
Formal Discussion Forum Requirements:
1. 
Initial Reply/Post:
      o Provide a complete answer to each of the questions asked.
      o Use at least 7-10 sentences (or more) to address each question.
      o Include at least one reference to support your discussion, properly cited in APA format. This reference can come from the textbook, lecture materials, or additional scholarly research you conduct.
      o Put all your answers in this initial Reply. Do not create separate Replies for each question.
2. 
Replies to Classmates:
      o After posting your initial Reply, review other students’ comments.
      o Pick at least two comments to Reply to in a meaningful way. Your Replies should add value by expanding on ideas, asking questions, or introducing new perspectives.
      o Each Reply should be at least 4 sentences long.
      o Make sure to include a citation in at least one of your Replies to further enrich the discussion.

Part B

Exercise 5.4 Aamodt Vocational Interest Survey (
I will attach the document for this part)

·
Due Feb 21 by 11:59pm

 

·
Points 10

 

·
Submitting a file upload

·
File Types doc, docx, rtf, and pdf

Document –> 
Exercise-5.4_Interest Inventory
Download Exercise-5.4_Interest Inventory

 

Complete the Interest Inventory and summarize your results in a separate document to be submitted. Complete the following:

1. Briefly summarize your Inventory results

2. Discuss briefly if you believe the results to be an accurate reflection of your characteristics

 

Part C

Exercise 6.3 – Determining the Proportion of Correct Decisions
(will attach the worksheet)

Exercise 6.3 Determining the Proportion of Correct Decisions

 

 
Instructions 

       Below you will find two sets of numbers.  The first number represents the employee’s score on a selection test.  Typically, the company 

must hire half of the applicants
 who apply for jobs.  The second number represents the number of months the employee was employed with the company.  To be considered a success, the employee must stay with the company long enough for it to recoup its recruitment and training costs.  The company believes that this period is 

five months
.  

       Use the data to complete the chart on the following page to determine the proportion of correct decisions that will be made if the company decides to use the test in the future.

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et