asked you to prepare the 2nd phase of the IR and include the following: Describe their literature search strategy and criteria related to the “Review

asked you to prepare the 2nd phase of the IR and include the following:

  1. Describe their literature search strategy and criteria related to the “Review Question”.
    1. 1-2 paragraphs
  2. Identify literature search inclusion/exclusion criteria.
    1. At least 2-3 inclusion criteria linked to the RQ.
    2. At least 2-3 exclusion criteria linked to the RQ.
  3. Perform a quality appraisal of evidence that meets the search inclusion criteria.
    1. At least 3-5 empirical sources
    2. At least 3-5 non-empirical sources
  4. List the quality appraisal result in the appendix and save all pdf evidence and evaluations.
    1. There should be 6-10 pdf sources submitted along with their quality appraisal.
  5. Discuss the quality appraisal results and submit all evidence and evaluations.

your quality appraisal portion needs to be expanded on to show similarities and differences in your chosen articles and need to use 6-10 articles- only 5 were here ( adding)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Required Readings & Resources American Counseling Association. (2014).

Required Readings & Resources American Counseling Association. (2014). 2014 ACA code of ethics . · Section F: “Supervision, Training, and Teaching” American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy. (2012). AAMFT code of ethics . National Association for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors. (2021). NAADAC code of ethics . The Importance

please see attachment ENG 106: Composition II Learning Unit 4: Instructions Peer Review: Informative Outline Instructions Author:

please see attachment ENG 106: Composition II Learning Unit 4: Instructions Peer Review: Informative Outline Instructions Author: _______________________ Reviewer: _______________________ 1. Is the thesis statement clear, specific, and neutral? Does the thesis present at least two legitimate sides to the debate? List any suggestions below. 2. Major Points in Arguments