100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Epps The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable

100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

Due 2/7/2025

Epps

The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy shape law enforcement procedures and criminal investigations. These principles define the boundaries of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, ensuring a balance between security and individual rights (Carpenter v. United States, 2018). This paper explores their meanings, legal importance, and challenges in law enforcement.

a) Reasonable Suspicion

Reasonable suspicion allows officers to stop and briefly detain individuals based on specific, articulable facts suggesting criminal activity (Terry v. Ohio, 1968). This standard is lower than probable cause but must be grounded in objective reasoning (Ornelas v. United States, 1996). Courts have applied this concept flexibly, considering location, behavior, and tips from informants (Illinois v. Wardlow, 2000). However, concerns about racial profiling remain a challenge (Harris, 2021). The Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio (1968) upheld stop-and-frisk procedures based on reasonable suspicion.

b) Probable Cause

Probable cause requires a reasonable belief, supported by evidence, that a crime has occurred (Beck v. Ohio, 1964). It is necessary for arrests, search warrants, and some warrantless searches. Courts determine probable cause by evaluating the totality of circumstances (Illinois v. Gates, 1983). The challenge lies in balancing law enforcement effectiveness with constitutional rights (Kerr, 2019). In Maryland v. Pringle (2003), the Court upheld arrests based on probable cause when contraband was found in a shared vehicle.

c) Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

The reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine, established in Katz v. United States (1967), protects individuals from unwarranted government intrusion. If a person expects privacy in a way society deems reasonable, law enforcement typically needs a warrant to search. Courts have debated privacy rights concerning digital data, GPS tracking, and third-party records (Riley v. California, 2014; Carpenter v. United States, 2018). In Carpenter (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that accessing cell phone location data without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment.

Reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy provide crucial safeguards against overreach while enabling law enforcement to investigate crimes. Courts continue refining these doctrines to address modern challenges, such as digital privacy and evolving technology.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

First, after reading the article, “Preventing Fatal Attractions,” come up with an original suggestion as to how inappropriate relationships between

First, after reading the article, “Preventing Fatal Attractions,” come up with an original suggestion as to how inappropriate relationships between inmates and correctional officers can be stopped. Please note, your suggestion may be creative; however, it should also be realistic. And, your suggestion must not have been discussed in the Worley et

Read attachment for assignment  Instructions Please complete each of the essay questions below: Essay 1: The Department of Homeland Security has

Read attachment for assignment  Instructions Please complete each of the essay questions below: Essay 1: The Department of Homeland Security has the goal to apply risk management principles to homeland security operations and has stated that “Ultimately, homeland security is about effectively managing risks to the Nation’s security” (DHS, 2010,