See attached for replies and instructions. CJUS 400 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 4

See attached for replies and instructions.

CJUS 400

Discussion Assignment Instructions

The student will complete 4 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of 300 – 500 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 150 – 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citations in current APA format and quote 1 Scripture in support of the thread. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in current APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly journals (not the textbook but should include the Bible, etc.).

This course utilizes the Post-First feature in all Discussions. This means you will only be able to read and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your thread in response to the provided prompt.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

200 word response with references/intext citation Due 2/5/2025 Post 2: Q2 Domestic

200 word response with references/intext citation Due 2/5/2025 Post 2: Q2 Domestic violence investigations often require nuanced approaches, particularly in the absence of clear physical evidence. Discuss a range of investigative techniques an investigator might employ to substantiate a domestic violence case. How can behavioral analysis, witness statements, forensic evidence,

500 word response 2 references/intext citations Due 1/22/2025 Answer the two questions

500 word response 2 references/intext citations Due 1/22/2025 Answer the two questions below Rule Making Process Case Study:   Food Stamps and Fast Food   Bloomberg Businessweek reported in November of 2011 on an interesting and controversial fast-food and government benefits controversy. The giant fast-food company, Yum Brands, wants government to allow low-income