500 word response 2 references/intext citations Due 1/15/2025 Major Question Doctrine

500 word response 2 references/intext citations

Due 1/15/2025

Major Question Doctrine

A recent and critically important administrative law doctrine is being established by the US Supreme Court over the last 5 years culminating in the case of 

Biden v. Nebraska site.
 where the high court struck down the US Department of Education’s regulations forging portions of their student loan debt.  Here is some commentary on the “Major Questions Doctrine” as to its application to the student loan case decision:

This major question doctrine can be articulated here  
Major Questions Doctrine.pdf

This major question doctrine was solidified within case law in the landmark USSCT decision in 
West Virginia v. EPA (2022) found in our textbook on page 548  It explains in detail a “major question” and how that preempts an administrative agency’s decision making on a certain topic/issue. 

1. Explain the “Major Question Doctrine” in your own words and explain if this new doctrine swallows up the “rule” that administrative agencies are given great deference in their decisions on interpretations and implementations of the legislative acts; and

2. Would it be ethical for the US Department of Education to continue its attempts for such loan forgiveness regulations?  Pick one of the below ethical theories assigned to the first letter of your last name (Ethical Relativism), explain it, then apply it to the facts of this case and conclude under it if it is moral/ethical to forgive such student loans?  You will have to do some independent research on each of the below ethical theories online to learn about them and how they work.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Shroeder Post 2 Q2: The orientations of trying to prove a case and uncovering the truth aren’t necessarily different. If investigators coexist, between both, it takes balance. The main goal should be uncovering the truth. Uncovering the truth despite the tension is

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Epps

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Epps Post 2 Q2: Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Schroeder Post 1 Q1: “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods by piecing together events, memories, and behaviors to make a timeline. This allows us to understand what happened before, during, and after. Technologies aid this process. For example, forensic analysis, surveillance,

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Bet

100 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/10/2025 Bet Post 1 Q1: “Reconstructing the past” intersects with investigative methods in more than one way, and particularly in the area of criminal investigations. The process of reconstructing the past involves accumulating pieces of evidence to put together and gain a better

Use references/intext citations Due 1/10/2025 Researching Federal Administrative Agencies

Use references/intext citations Due 1/10/2025 Researching Federal Administrative Agencies There are many federal administrative agencies and sub-agencies that have the power and authority to make regulations, enforce the regulations, and try violators in their own mini-court systems with administrative law judges.  Play this informational video (all parts) on how to