Attached Assessment title: AS1 Individual Report (2300 Words) Please read the whole assessment brief before starting work

Attached

Assessment title: AS1 Individual Report (2300 Words)

Please read the whole assessment brief before starting work on the Assessment Tasks.

The Assessment Tasks

You are expected to write a report in MS Doc or Docx format, completing all the following two tasks:

Task 1: Quantitative vs Qualitative Analysis Approaches in Mental Health Interventions

Investigate the varying approaches to decision-making in the context of developing mental health

interventions for UK youth and young adults by comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative

analysis methods.

Guidelines:

1. Select and describe three specific techniques from each category (quantitative and qualitative) that

are relevant to mental health research. These techniques might include statistical analysis, modelling

for quantitative methods, and interviews, focus groups, or thematic analysis for qualitative methods.

2. Emphasize techniques that are particularly relevant to mental health interventions, providing

examples from this sector.

3. Highlight circumstances under which qualitative analysis is more appropriate compared to

quantitative analysis, and vice versa, in the context of mental health.

2

4. Summarise the key points of your comparison in a table to clarify differences and applications of each

approach. (Word count: 900 words, ±10%).

Task 2: Systems Dynamics/Thinking in Mental Health Role Analysis

Mental Health Amongst Young Adults of Black Heritage in the UK

Mental health disparities among young adults of Black heritage in the UK have been well-documented in

various studies. This population, particularly those aged 18–30, faces unique challenges that contribute to

mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and psychosis. According to research, young Black adults

experience mental health challenges at higher rates than their white counterparts due to factors such as

racial discrimination, socioeconomic inequality, and cultural stigma(SpringerLink)(Home). These challenges

are exacerbated by systemic barriers, including limited access to culturally competent mental health

services(SpringerLink).

Your task is to analyse these mental health disparities using Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) and Stock and

Flow Diagrams (SFDs). By leveraging a systems thinking approach, you will assess the interactions between

key factors contributing to poor mental health outcomes and propose potential interventions. Your goal is

to use these tools to provide insights into how different variables interact and to simulate the impact of

potential interventions aimed at improving mental health among Black British young adults.

Deliverables:

1. Causal Loop Diagram (CLD): Clearly labelled with all relevant variables and explanations for each feedback

loop.

2. Stock and Flow Diagram (SFD): Clearly labelled with stocks, flows, and feedback structures. Include a brief

description of how your model captures the dynamics of mental health over time.

3. Intervention Proposal: A summary of three interventions that you believe will have the most significant

impact on improving mental health outcomes. Use the CLD and SFD to support your argument.

4. Simulation (Optional): Use Vensim or another system dynamics simulation tool to simulate the outcomes of

the interventions over time. Show how each intervention changes the behaviour of the system.

Submission Guidelines:

• Use Vensim or any other system dynamics software to create the diagrams.

• Ensure that each diagram is clear, with appropriate labelling of feedback loops and

interactions between variables.

• Write a brief report summarizing your findings and discussing how the system dynamics

model provides insights into the complex mental health challenges faced by Black British

young adults.

Learning Outcomes:

Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:

▪ Critically discuss the differences between quantitative vs. qualitative business analysis approaches.

▪ Successfully critique Systems Thinking for analysis using a wide range of appropriate sources and

resources.

▪ Communicate effectively using different communication means such as report writing, use of ICT

and, poster and/or oral presentation, to convey complex topics and concepts.

3

▪ Autonomously evaluate specialised contexts, requiring selection and application from a wide range

of information sources

Note: The word counts exclude the full list of references. Your report should include an introduction,

overview of literature on system dynamics/system thinking, method, findings, and conclusion sections

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

For this discussion, refer to the adaptive leadership toolkit. Effective leaders collaborate with others, as multiple inputs result in better outcomes.

For this discussion, refer to the adaptive leadership toolkit. Effective leaders collaborate with others, as multiple inputs result in better outcomes. In this discussion, you will share the leadership skills and behaviors you have identified and provide some brief rationale for the selection. You will also receive feedback and possibly questions from

Everything it attached below HERE IS THE

Everything it attached below HERE IS THE READING image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.png image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image25.png image26.png image27.png image28.png image29.png image30.png image1.jpeg image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png

Homework  JWI 575: New Business Ventures and Entrepreneurship Academic Submissions and Evaluation © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved.

Homework  JWI 575: New Business Ventures and Entrepreneurship Academic Submissions and Evaluation © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.