Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt: You are getting settled into your seat for

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt:

You are getting settled into your seat for a very long plane ride home. As you get to know the person next to you, you learn that they are a devout atheist who believes that God is a myth that people have invented to make them feel better. After listening carefully to why this person does not believe in God, you have an opportunity to explain why you do believe in God. What would you say? In your response, you may share your personal story or testimony of faith (although not required), but you must share some objective evidence to support your faith in God and back up this evidence with solid, academic sources.Incorporate at least four references from the reading assignments, supplementary reading material, class lectures, and personal observations into your paper. Use APA formatting and be sure to properly source and cite all references.

Why do you believe God exists? What are your logic-based reasons? If your personal testimony never occurred, or before your personal experience happened, were there logical reasons to believe in the existence of God? Your paper should explain why is it more logical to believe in theism (“God exists”) rather than in atheism (“God does not exist”). Select one argument (and only one argument) for the existence of God, and then provide a depth of analysis on that single argument. The following list provides popular arguments for the existence of God:

  • Video: The Argument from Design: The Fine-Tuning of the Universe
  • Website: The First Cause Argument
  • Website: The Argument from Conscience
  • Website: The Argument from Morality
  • Website: The Argument from Desire

To defend and analyze an argument means to answer Yes to these questions and give an explanation: Are the key terms clear? Are the premises true? Is the conclusion logical? Logical thinking skills must be demonstrated in contrast to merely sharing stories, experiences, or emotions. The vast majority of the paper should primarily focus on presenting an argument for the existence of God, rather than focus on responding to objections against the existence of God. Again, present with depth a logical argument and then defend it. 

You must share some objective evidence to support your belief in God’s existence, and back up this objective evidence with solid, academic sources. Objective evidence means logic and data. For this philosophy course, the paper should not try and prove the validity nor historicity of the Bible, but instead, present the philosophical logic for the existence of God. After the first half-page, the paper should not (a) share personal testimonies, or (b) share subjective experiences, or (c) merely quote the Bible as supernatural revelation, which an atheist would not consider authoritative.

Note: This is a dialogue. Write as if you are having the conversation with this person. It might be hard to fully write a complete back-and-forth of every part of the exchange, but make sure to include how you would present your personal experience and your rational arguments for God’s existence. This paper is intentionally moving you toward a personal formulation of your worldview and preparing you to write your final worldview paper for this class.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Considering Development & Professional Youth Development to Identify Program Targets (Tue 10/22) Submit a brief paper that addresses key developmental

Considering Development & Professional Youth Development to Identify Program Targets (Tue 10/22) Submit a brief paper that addresses key developmental and/or PYD practice research and theory to identify and justify the type of program and youth outcomes you’ll target. We should see the logical connection between developmental research/theory PYD frameworks/practices

Leadership Problem Analysis & Solutions 1. Through a short video (or face to face oral presentation), share your leadership knowledge through analysis of a

Leadership Problem Analysis & Solutions 1. Through a short video (or face to face oral presentation), share your leadership knowledge through analysis of a leadership challenge that you have faced. Develop, evaluate and critique alternative solutions which allow you to demonstrate the communication skills, critical thinking skills, and leadership theories

Journal 13: There is a maximum of 1500 characters. 1.      Discuss what you mean by family values. 2.      Distinguish between the public and private

Journal 13: There is a maximum of 1500 characters. 1.      Discuss what you mean by family values. 2.      Distinguish between the public and private aspects of human sexuality. Do you think that this distinction is important when examining morality, marriage and human sexuality? Explain your reasoning. 3.      Discuss the advantages