attached Evaluate Stage: Peer Review Instructions You will be asked to evaluate the

attached


Evaluate Stage: Peer Review Instructions

You will be asked to evaluate the submission other groups oral presentation. A rubric will be available so that you may rate your fellow peers on their presentation.

In the Evaluate phase of this assignment, your group will evaluate the oral presentation and powerpoint for two assigned groups. Within this phase of the assignment you will practice scoring submissions based on a rubric and providing written feedback as well.

This phase of the assignment allows you to practice delivering constructive and positive feedback to others. This is a critical skill to master within the field of ABA.

·
Use the rubric provided in Kritik to assign scores and ensure fair, objective grading.

·
Read each item on the rubric carefully so that you know what you are rating

·
Ratings should fair and directly related to the item on the rubric

·
Collaborate with your group to reach a consensus for each evaluation.

·
Provide constructive feedback and use a positive tone.

·
Write a comment on their oral presentation and powerpoint presentation.

·
Must be 20 or more words

·
Focus on:

·
Strengths of the presentation and PowerPoint.

·
Specific, actionable suggestions for improvement.

·
Use of professional, constructive language.

·
Remain objective when grading a group. Do not compare one groups submission to the other groups submission. The point of reference should be the rubric and whether they’re meeting the designated guidelines.

·
Submit your evaluations by the specified deadline.

Grading during the Evaluation Stage

As you prepare to evaluate your peers’ presentations during the Evaluation Stage in Kritik, I want to remind you of the importance of grading objectively. Your evaluations should be based solely on the criteria outlined in the rubric, not on comparisons between groups.

It’s natural to notice when one group goes above and beyond, but this should not result in lower scores for other groups that fully meet the rubric’s standards. If a group satisfies all the rubric criteria, they deserve full credit for those elements—regardless of whether another group performed exceptionally well. The rubric is the standard by which all presentations should be graded, and everyone should be evaluated fairly based on that standard.

Here are a few tips to ensure fair and objective evaluations:

1. Review the rubric thoroughly before starting the evaluation process, and keep it open while grading.

2. Focus on the content and delivery of the presentation in relation to the rubric, rather than comparing it to other presentations.

3. Provide constructive and specific feedback based on what you observe in the presentation and how it aligns with the rubric criteria.

This skill—remaining objective, supportive, and positive in evaluations—is an essential one for BCaBAs, especially when practicing in a supervisory role. As future supervisors, you will train therapists and caregivers with varying levels of skill and experience. To be effective in this role, you’ll need to focus on clear performance criteria, provide supportive feedback, and maintain a positive and professional tone, even when some individuals may exceed expectations while others are still learning. Practicing this skill now will help you excel as a leader in the future.

Evaluations:

1.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

powerpoint presentation CAMPUS EXPLORATION Presented by Leanngeli Latorre Course: UNIV104_B68_202530 ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER (ASC) • The

powerpoint presentation CAMPUS EXPLORATION Presented by Leanngeli Latorre Course: UNIV104_B68_202530 ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER (ASC) • The Academic Success Center provides tutoring, writing services and academic workshops to support student success. • Located at Demoss Hall, Room 1100. • Email: [email protected] • Phone: (434) 592-6387 *url can be found on page

Help with developing Descriptive, Associative, and Causal Research Questions. Resources: ·

Help with developing Descriptive, Associative, and Causal Research Questions. Resources: · Correlation and Causation: Tyler Vigen’s Spurious Correlations SAGE Publications. (Publisher). (2017).  Correlation and causation: Tyler Vigen’s spurious correlations [Video file]. SAGE Publications, Ltd. This video explains how correlation does not always mean causation or a meaningful relationship. · Distinguishing Correlational

see attachment  Interview Instructions 1. 1. Review the discussion

see attachment  Interview Instructions 1. 1. Review the discussion material for this module and additional references. Review the previous modules and the topics discussed in the course so far. 2. This activity consists of interviewing a person who works in an area related to the topics or study of human

1 3 [Instructional text in this template is contained

1 3 [Instructional text in this template is contained in square brackets ([…]). After reading the instructional text, please delete it, and use the document as a template for your own paper. To keep the correct format, cover page, and reference list with your own information, and add your own