VAL- UP TO 11/14/2024- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE

VAL- UP TO 11/14/2024-

***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED*****

****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED******

PART 1- Module 1- DISCUSSION- (VAL)-

Course Title: Business Ethics

This discussion board post will take the form of a debate about utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics. The rules are as follows:

You are on “team utilitarian ethics”.

You must make an initial post trying to defend taking your team’s ethics as best for business. Your initial post must be at least 200. You should number your arguments for clarity, and if you are referencing anything, provide documentation to back up your claims through citations. You need to put forward the best argument you can to persuade others on behalf of your team’s ethical position. Of course it’s harder to defend a position that you do not prefer or that is not your own; but it also helps us to better understand these positions if we take the time to ‘think them through from within.’ 

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 200-300 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from either (1) your textbook or (2) two academic sources. 

PART 2- Module 2- DISCUSSION- (VAL)-

Course Title: Business Ethics

This discussion board post will take the form of a debate about the model of corporate social responsibility and “free-market” or neoclassical economic theory. The rules are as follows:

• You are on “the team for the economic model of corporate social responsibility”;

You must make an initial post trying to defend taking your team’s economic model as both best and true. Your initial post must be at least 200 words. You should number your arguments for clarity, and if you are referencing anything, provide documentation to back up your claims through citations. You need to put forward the best argument you can to persuade others on behalf of your team’s position regarding economic model. Of course, it’s harder to defend a position that you do not prefer or that is not your own; but it also helps us to better understand these positions if we take the time to ‘think them through from within.’

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 200-300 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from either (1) your textbook or (2) two academic sources. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

CASE STUDY: PRICING AND DELIVERY AT KAR FOODS ASSIGNMENTINSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEWThis week there is a focus on managing demand to counter predictable

CASE STUDY: PRICING AND DELIVERY AT KAR FOODS ASSIGNMENTINSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEWThis week there is a focus on managing demand to counter predictable variability through priceand promotion. By using sales and operations planning to manage supply and demand together,overall profitability can be maximized. Collaboration can improve supply chain performance. Alack of coordination

5-2 Project Draft: Understanding Our Identity Through the Humanities HUM 102 Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and RubricOverview Congratulations! You

5-2 Project Draft: Understanding Our Identity Through the Humanities HUM 102 Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and RubricOverview Congratulations! You are three-quarters of the way through the cour 5-2 Project Draft: Understanding Our Identity Through the Humanities HUM 102 Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and RubricOverview Congratulations! You are three-quarters

BA 385 Final Case Study: Target’s 2025 DEI Retrenchment and the Stakeholder Fallout Background In early 2025, Target Corporation made the controversial

BA 385 Final Case Study: Target’s 2025 DEI Retrenchment and the Stakeholder Fallout Background In early 2025, Target Corporation made the controversial decision to scale back its long-standing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This included discontinuing the Racial Equity Action and Change (REACH) program and restructuring its Supplier Diversity