How to Ethically Use AI Programs  ChatGPT 4.0 listed the pros and cons of its use in a graduate program: Pros: ChatGPT can

How to Ethically Use AI Programs 

ChatGPT 4.0 listed the pros and cons of its use in a graduate program:

Pros: ChatGPT can provide instant, comprehensive responses, aiding in research and clarifying complex topics. It’s a valuable supplemental tool, enhancing self-paced learning and promoting diverse perspectives.

Cons: Over-reliance on ChatGPT might inhibit critical thinking or original research. It can’t replace in-depth mentorship and tailored guidance from human instructors.

The Unethical Approach

“Submitting a paper written by ChatGPT to grad school is academically dishonest. It undermines the purpose of education, which is to develop one’s own analytical and writing skills. Representing AI-generated content as personal work breaches ethical and academic standards, potentially leading to severe consequences, including expulsion. Always prioritize originality and integrity.” -ChatGPT 4.0.

Module 3 Discussion Week 1 Resources


Schools look to ban ChatGPT, students use it anyway
 (2023)


Should schools ban or integrate generative AI in the classroom?
 (2023)


Universities say AI cheats can’t be beaten, moving away from attempts to block AI
 (2023)

Scholarly Readings:


Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects
 (2023)


ChatGPT by OpenAI: Students’ Viewpoint on Cheating using Artificial Intelligence-Based Application
 (2023) Download PDF


Week 1 Discussion Post

Use Google to research why it is unethical to use ChatGPT or another AI program to write work for classes. Be sure to critically assess the resource(s) used.

This post should be 2 paragraphs (150-200 words). Since you are engaging in research, be sure to 

cite
 in the body of the post and 

add a reference list in APA format
. NOTE: Failure to use research with 

accompanying in-text citations
 to support content will result in reduced scoring “Level 2-Developing” on the grading rubric

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning and staffing deficiencies. The CEO has decided to hire a consulting firm to evaluate its current processes and make recommendations for improvement. Upon initial review, the consulting firm has determined that

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions below. SCENARIO: Your company, a growing firm in the financial services industry, is extremely sensitive to the issues surrounding business ethics. The company wants to be proactive in developing a

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Week 1 Discussion Post Take the survey,  Test your Cultural Intelligence . While

Week 1 Discussion Post Take the survey,  Test your Cultural Intelligence . While this survey offers interesting insights, it doesn’t adhere to scientific rigor. Use its findings accordingly. Explain if you think the results accurately describe you and why. Consider sharing your experiences that may have played into the results.