Pambianchi v. Arkansas Tech University 95 F.Supp.3d 1101 (2015) The case summary omits the discussion of whether Ms. Pambianchi was discriminated

 

Pambianchi v. Arkansas Tech University 95 F.Supp.3d 1101 (2015)

  1. The case summary omits the discussion of whether Ms. Pambianchi was discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation because in March 2015, sexual orientation was not projected by Title VII. Note that sexual orientation was deemed protected by Title VII in July 2015. Do you think Ms. Pambianchi would have had a stronger case if she had argued after the law was changed? Why or Why not? 

 2. This case was filed using Title VII, but presents many other legal issues. What specifically about the facts of this case do you think might be the basis for legal challenges? Explain your reasoning. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

1.In our reading, Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences, we explored foundational criminological theories and how they are shaped by

1.In our reading, Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences, we explored foundational criminological theories and how they are shaped by the social contexts in which they emerge. Crime is a complex phenomenon influenced by both individual decision-making and broader societal conditions. Early explanations of crime were rooted in spiritual and moral