see attachment  Module 6:  Create a Theory Study the theorists mentioned in this module. Choose at least three

see attachment 

Module 6: 
Create a Theory

Study the theorists mentioned in this module. Choose at least three thinkers whose ideas will not pass on to the future of psychology, and give at least two reasons explaining why. Now choose two thinkers whose ideas you think will pass on to the future of psychology, and provide at least two reasons explaining why.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 p.m. ET on Sunday.

· Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) an

  Hi All, Dr. Deats, a psychiatrist who interviewed Richard Kuklinski, referred to as the Iceman, utilized the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) to measure his psychopathic characteristics. The PCL-R, created by Robert Hare, assesses psychopathy through 20 criteria divided into two primary factors: Interpersonal/Affective and

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et