Create a 3-5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and evaluate the

Create a 3-5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question.

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document (accessible from the ”

Create PICO(T) Questions
” page in the Capella library’s Evidence Based Practice guide) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria:

· Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question

· Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.).

· Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue.

· Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.

· Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style.

For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

·
Length of submission: Create a 3-5 page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

·
Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

·
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Gynecologic Health Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems

Gynecologic Health Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, diagnostic approaches, as well as the development of treatment plans. For this Case Study

Marian Vinas Florida National University Professor: Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo December 11, 2024    Trauma-informed Care Trauma-sensitive care is a

Marian Vinas Florida National University Professor: Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo December 11, 2024    Trauma-informed Care Trauma-sensitive care is a crucial model for caring for patients’ physical, psychological, and emotional well-being in the context of trauma. DJ’s case exemplifies the need for such an approach as her presentation to the emergency

  Ana Florida National University MSN Capstone Project-DBX-DL01 To ensure stakeholder buy-in for the adolescent smoking cessation program in a primary

  Ana Florida National University MSN Capstone Project-DBX-DL01 To ensure stakeholder buy-in for the adolescent smoking cessation program in a primary care clinic in Miami-Dade County (Citrus Palm Community Center), the proposal must strategically address the priorities and concerns of involved parties. The problem should be clearly defined and supported

Case Study Assignment: differential diagnoses and diagnostic testing When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses

Case Study Assignment: differential diagnoses and diagnostic testing When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools to help in understanding a patient’s condition. In turn, beginning with a differential diagnosis supports the process of further applying

Contextual Factors   What is the impact of contextual factors on advocacy and policy? Contextual factors can range from internal (the organization,

Contextual Factors   What is the impact of contextual factors on advocacy and policy? Contextual factors can range from internal (the organization, the practice, the environment, the culture, etc.) to external (laws, policies, politics, regulations, etc.). However, whether originating internally or externally, contextual factors have the capability of advancing or