Need help with draft question Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html IDS 400 Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric Overview An

Need help with draft question

Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html

IDS 400 Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

An essential part of developing critical analysis skills is self-reflection. In this activity, you will have the opportunity to consider how critically analyzing your topic of diversity has affected your life and how you view the world around you. This is your time to think about your personal experiences and your beliefs, assumptions, and values. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the reflection section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.

Directions

In this activity, you will describe how using critical analysis influences your life and your perspectives. First, you will describe how critical analysis skills have affected your personal experience. Next, you will describe how examining your bias has influenced how you perceive the world. Finally, you will explain how critical analysis skills can positively impact your academic or professional lives.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  1. Describe how critically analyzing your topic has positively informed your personal experience.
  2. Describe how examining your bias has altered the way you perceive the world.
  3. Explain how critically analyzing diversity can positively influence your field of study or profession.

What to Submit

Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the
Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

Module Five Activity Rubric

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Personal Experience Describes how critically analyzing the topic has positively informed personal experiences Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting critical analysis of topic to personal experience or providing more detail about that connection Does not attempt criterion 30
Bias Describes how examining bias has altered ways of perceiving the world Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the examination of bias to perceptions or providing more detail about that connection Does not attempt criterion 30
Field of Study or Profession Explains how critically analyzing diversity can positively influence field of study or profession Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the critical analysis of diversity to field of study or profession or providing more detail about that connection Does not attempt criterion 30
Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 10
Total: 100%

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SEE ATTACHED. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED. TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning

Scenario Wesley Enterprises is a long-term care facility. The organization was recently cited for deficiencies including infectious disease planning and staffing deficiencies. The CEO has decided to hire a consulting firm to evaluate its current processes and make recommendations for improvement. Upon initial review, the consulting firm has determined that

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions

Critical thinking—consider what you have learned in this chapter reading. Students will complete the required assignment by following the instructions below. SCENARIO: Your company, a growing firm in the financial services industry, is extremely sensitive to the issues surrounding business ethics. The company wants to be proactive in developing a

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13

SWEE ATTACHED  TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of