Discussion 1. Discussion Question: Create a post with a discussion question.  This can be a short post, just a sentence or three, that

Discussion

1.
Discussion Question: Create a post with a discussion question.  This can be a short post, just a sentence or three, that poses an interesting question.  For example, “Based on the material from this week, what additional research do psychologists need to conduct to continue to understand and reduce racial prejudice?”  Or “In addition to business meetings and juries, what are some other situations where we could see group decision-making happening in the real world?  And what potential problems would arise during such a meeting?”

2.
Two Discussion Replies: Provide a reply to at least two different questions that someone else has posed.  Your reply should be at least a paragraph long, at least 150 words long.  You can also reply to other people’s replies instead of just the question.  In your reply, you must reference material that we have covered that week and how it relates to the question, but you can certainly expand your reply beyond the material and discuss your own ideas as well.  For example, “In keeping with what we learned about the bystander effect, because more bystanders present doesn’t necessarily increase the chances of receiving help, I recommend trying to point at one person specifically to ask for help.  The idea is to make that person feel some amount of responsibility in the situation.  Additionally, I would recommend……(reply continues up to 150 words or more)”  That reply references the material from the week (the bystander effect) but it also includes the student’s opinion on what to do in such a situation. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about

  The assessment measures that the psychiatrist used seem to be various questions or an interview-style assessment. He asked various questions about Richard’s childhood, thoughts, feelings, beliefs, morals, reasons for his crimes, people, family, and children. Richard Kuklinski has various psychopathic traits that the psychiatrist was attempting to fish out.

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached a

    Based on the current discussion on assessing reliability, James et al. (1984) discuss approaches to assessing inter-rater agreement (see attached article). How do their findings inform best practices for improving rater reliability in applied settings? Answering this challenge question “counts” as a discussion respond    rwg James et

LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2024). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary

LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2024). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications (8th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Chapter 12, “Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology: Some Highlights” (pp. 495–533) Walden University, LLC. (n.d.). Social change ( change) . change Writing Resources Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.).

please follow the instructions LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2024). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical

please follow the instructions LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2024). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications (8th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Chapter 12, “Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology: Some Highlights” (pp. 495–533) Walden University, LLC. (n.d.). Social change ( change) . change Writing Resources Walden