Please choose a landmark case from the list provided below.  Then, provide a brief description of the case selected.  Next, provide the historical

 

Please choose a landmark case from the list provided below.  Then, provide a brief description of the case selected.  Next, provide the historical context in which the case was argued (e.g., what events were taking place in society that led the US Supreme Court to hear this particular case).   Provide the historical evolution of the case, from the time it was argued in court to the present time. Finally, discuss the impact and implication the case had in the treatment and management of juveniles in the criminal or juvenile justice systems and provide a personal position with respect the Supreme Court’s ruling.  If you agree with the ruling discuss why there was a need to change the law.  If you disagree with the position, explain the negative implications of this ruling on juvenile offenders.

Landmark US Supreme Court Cases:

Kent v. US (1966)

In re Gault (1967)

In re Winship (1970)

McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (1971)

Breed v. Jones (1975)

Stanford v. Kentucky (1988)

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

Graham v. Florida (2010)

J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011)

Jackson v. Hobbs (2011)

Miller v. Alabama (2012)

Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016)

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

See attachment. You encounter two inmates who are combat veterans. One of the inmates has developed symptoms of PTSD, experiences flashbacks and

See attachment. You encounter two inmates who are combat veterans. One of the inmates has developed symptoms of PTSD, experiences flashbacks and nightmares, avoids conversations about his military experience, isolates himself from others, appears sad and irritable frequently, and has difficulty concentrating. The other inmate, who had similar experiences in

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 3/27/2024 Vassel “The validity of latent fingerprinting identification as a science has been

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 3/27/2024 Vassel “The validity of latent fingerprinting identification as a science has been receiving growing scholarly attention. The courts, however, have almost uniformly not only held that fingerprint identification withstands scrutiny under Daubert, but have largely ignored or sidestepped the scholarly arguments on