Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources. 

 Review the two classic psychology studies (Milgram’s Obedience to Authority and Zimbardo’s Stamford Prison Experiment) under Readings and Resources.  Using evidence from Chapter 3 of your textbook, as well as the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, discuss two (2) ways in which research ethics were violated in one (1) of these studies.  Then, discuss two (2) ways you would make the study more ethically sound if you were to rerun the study today.  With your ethical considerations in place, do you think you would learn as much about obedience as Milgram did in his original research or as much as Zimbardo did about the power of social roles?  Why or why not?  Finally, do you think it was ethical that Milgram or Zimbardo only studied white males?  How might their study results have differed if their sample was more culturally diverse? 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  Domestic terrorism typically involves acts perpetrated by individuals or groups within the borders of their own country, often motivated by grievances

  Domestic terrorism typically involves acts perpetrated by individuals or groups within the borders of their own country, often motivated by grievances against their government or societal institutions, and international terrorism involves acts carried out by individuals or groups operating across national borders, often with transnational objectives or affiliations with

attached Comment to your peer: When B.F. Skinner introduced radical behaviorism, he argued that an individual’s behavior and surrounding

attached Comment to your peer: When B.F. Skinner introduced radical behaviorism, he argued that an individual’s behavior and surrounding environmental factors that influence said behavior are more crucial to the fundamental understanding of a person’s psychological state of mind. Taking a radical behavioral perspective, I would not consider an individual